Talk:Biquaternion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mathematics Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, which collaborates on articles related to mathematics.
Mathematics rating:	Start Class	Low Priority	Field: Algebra
Please update this rating as the article progresses, or if the rating is inaccurate. Click to show/hide comments. Please add to or update the comments to suggest improvements to the article. Please add useful comments here--Cronholm144 07:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

	Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.
Help with this template Comments: edit – history – watch – refresh Please add useful comments here--Cronholm144 07:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Conflict of terminology

There seems to be a conflict of terminology with regards to the name biquaternion. Hamilton appears to have used the term to mean a quaternion with complex coefficients (i.e. C⊗H), while Clifford (in Preliminary Sketch of Biquaternions, 1873) uses the term to mean an algebra isomorphic to H⊕H, which follows the quaternions in the sequence of Clifford algebras:

R → C → H → H⊕H → ...

The complexified quaternions are not isomorphic to Clifford's biquaternions. This page presently discusses Hamilton's notion, while the German version of the page discuss's Clifford's notion. Some mention should be made of the conflict. I'm not sure which term is more commonly used. -- Fropuff 21:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Note that Hamilton used the term first (it appears in his 'Lectures on Quaternions', 1853, article 669, available at http://historical.library.cornell.edu/math/). Sangwine 21:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Clifford biquaternion

Since the structure of Clifford biquaternions is demonstrably different than the classical twentieth century concept of biquaternions used to develop the relativity transformations, the works of the Clifford algebraists on their biquaternion need a separate space. Rgdboer 01:35, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Well okay; I'm not sure the name is standard, but I guess we have to disambig them somehow. At any rate we should probably mention the alternate meaning somewhere in the intro to this article.

Of course, Hamilton's biquaternions also form a Clifford algebra, just with the opposite signature from Clifford's biquaternions. They fit into the sequence

R → C^~ → H^~ → C⊗H → ...

with C^~ and H^~ being the split-complex numbers and split-quaternions respectively. -- Fropuff 04:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)