Talk:Bionicle 2: Legends of Metru Nui

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bionicle 2: Legends of Metru Nui article.
Article policies
Good article Bionicle 2: Legends of Metru Nui has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
June 4, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
The Bionicle 2: Legends of Metru Nui article is part of WikiProject Lego, an attempt to expand, update, and improve all articles relating to Lego on Wikipedia. You may edit this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives for the project.
A
This article has been rated as A-Class on the quality scale.
Mid
This article has been rated as Mid-Importance on the importance scale.
Film Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Low
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
To-do list for Bionicle 2: Legends of Metru Nui: edit · history · watch · refresh
  • Get to GA status

Contents

[edit] GA Result

There are 7 things that must pass before an article reaches GA status. I have reviewed it and the result is as follows:

  1. Well-written: On Hold
  2. Factually accurate: Pass
  3. Broad: Pass
  4. Neutrally written: Pass
  5. Stable: Pass
  6. Well-referenced: Pass
  7. Images: Pass

Needs copy-editing per the to do list, please remove the notice when its done, and notify me on my talk page, cheers —Minun Spiderman 19:40, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I failed it because Minun posted a copyedit notice, but it hasn't had a notice posted on the article page, and the last edit was on Aug. 2. It has been a week. -Dark Kubrick 20:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA on hold

Oooh, I like these toys. Dates have to be wiki-linked in references, and there's no harm in telling the full story in the plot. Alientraveller 16:22, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Also, titles of stories need to be italicised, and mythology doesn't need to be linked. Alientraveller 14:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Passed. Not great, not bad enough to not be listed. Alientraveller 18:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 9 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message) 00:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Behindthescenesbionicle2.jpg

Image:Behindthescenesbionicle2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)