User talk:Bin2k1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I got your message.

As response, I changed several part of your correction.

1. Commandent is a kind of commander's position; never means a command structure.

2. Commander means a person only; not a command structure. There is no English dictionary which explains as a command structure.

3. I didn't touch Chief of Naval Operations, but most of English uses country doesn't take it as a command structure but as a position of commander - unless it is correct in grammer. Dictionary also has opportunity to explain its meaning easily for its users.

If you want to explain command structure of ROK Navy, I suggest to make another section which is named as ROK Navy Command Structure - as like Italian Navy page in Wikipedia.

---

Perhaps it was unclear to me, what the definition of "vandalism" was. I feel that I should apologize to you for the corruption of the definition, and I hope that you will take note of the "Won-su" article that stated that the rank exists on paper. Good day, and with due apologies.

--

Hello Mr. Bin2k1. Are you referring to the above comment? No. That comment/revision is foreign to me. I'm using a public hotspot, so that may be the coincidence. However, I am unsure of what reckless vandalism you refer to, and why you demand my apology. I am equally unsure of what you mean by wonsu. Please clear things up for me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.184.238 (talk) 00:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Regardinng your talks on 1 Nov and 2 Nov

Dear anonymous (75.66.184.238),

If you were not the same person who deleted the apology by 75.66.164.93 on my talk page on July 2007, it would be fine. I guess someone used the same IP before to edit my talk page. However, I intend to keep 75.66.164.93's apology, which I believe would have no connection with you whatsoever, on my talk page. I would like to recommend logging in order to avoid further misunderstanding.

Good day.--Bin2k1 05:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Follow up on early November events

Oh, glad that's over then. So If I leave your talk page in this state, you have nothing further to request of me, correct (apart from the ambiguity deriving from the IP address)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.184.238 (talk) 20:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

I made the request to the person who made changes on my talk page back in July; since you are not the person, it has nothing to do with you. Thank you for your understanding.--Bin2k1 02:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ROKS Dangpo (PCE 56).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ROKS Dangpo (PCE 56).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image

Can you add this image into the appropriate page. [1] Chanakyathegreat (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the great photo.--Bin2k1 (talk) 09:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)