From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No higher resolution available.Bin_laden_12_27a.jpg (194 × 165 pixels, file size: 11 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Image is copyrighted to Al-Jazeera, being a screenshot of the December 26, 2001 broadcast of a tape created by Osama Bin Laden, and carried around the world on Al-Jazeera's Qatar station. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haemo (talk • contribs)
[edit] Fair use rationales for Bin_laden_12_27a.jpg
- It is believed that the use of this image on the English-language Wikipedia to illustrate an article on the event in question falls under the "Non-profit educational" clause of the Fair Use doctrine currently upheld by United States law. (17 U.S.C. § 107)
- The image is irreplaceable; a free analogue is impossible to produce as the original will be covered by copyright for the foreseeable future.
- Owing to the limited web-resolution of the image, only a small portion of a copyrighted work is used.
- For the same reasons, the portion of the copyrighted work used is of inherently lower quality than the original, reducing the risk of competitiveness and therefore the effects of this copy on the market for or value of versions held by the owner of the copyright.
- This image is used on various websites, and it was widely broadcast both by the originator, and news organizations, so its use on Wikipedia does not make it significantly more accessible or visible than it already is.
- The image is being used in an informative way and should not detract from the original work, nor does it imply endorsement of the article in question by the subject.
- The image is significant since it not only serves to provide primary illustration of the subject of commentary, (Bin Laden), but it also specifically demonstrates he, and his organization, using the media to capitalize on, and take credit for, the subject of the article -- a process which is of fundamental importance to the narrative of the events.
- It is believed that the use of this image on the English-language Wikipedia to illustrate an article on the event in question falls under the "Non-profit educational" clause of the Fair Use doctrine currently upheld by United States law. (17 U.S.C. § 107)
- The image is irreplaceable; a free analogue is impossible to produce as the original will be covered by copyright for the foreseeable future.
- Owing to the limited web-resolution of the image, only a small portion of a copyrighted work is used.
- For the same reasons, the portion of the copyrighted work used is of inherently lower quality than the original, reducing the risk of competitiveness and therefore the effects of this copy on the market for or value of versions held by the owner of the copyright.
- This image is used on various websites, and it was widely broadcast both by the originator, and news organizations, so its use on Wikipedia does not make it significantly more accessible or visible than it already is.
- The image is being used in an informative way and should not detract from the original work, nor does it imply endorsement of the article in question by the subject.
- The image is significant since it not only serves to provide primary illustration of the subject of commentary, (Bin Laden), but it also specifically demonstrates he, and his organization, using the media to capitalize on, and take credit for, the subject of the article -- a process which is of fundamental importance to the narrative of the events.
- It is believed that the use of this image on the English-language Wikipedia to illustrate an article on the event in question falls under the "Non-profit educational" clause of the Fair Use doctrine currently upheld by United States law. (17 U.S.C. § 107)
- The image is irreplaceable; a free analogue is impossible to produce as the original will be covered by copyright for the foreseeable future.
- Owing to the limited web-resolution of the image, only a small portion of a copyrighted work is used.
- For the same reasons, the portion of the copyrighted work used is of inherently lower quality than the original, reducing the risk of competitiveness and therefore the effects of this copy on the market for or value of versions held by the owner of the copyright.
- This image is used on various websites, and it was widely broadcast both by the originator, and news organizations, so its use on Wikipedia does not make it significantly more accessible or visible than it already is.
- The image is being used in an informative way and should not detract from the original work, nor does it imply endorsement of the article in question by the subject.
- The image is significant since it not only serves to provide primary illustration of the subject of commentary, (Bin Laden), but it also specifically demonstrates he, and his organization, using the media to capitalize on, and take credit for, the subject of the article -- a process which is of fundamental importance to the narrative of the events.
- It is believed that the use of this image on the English-language Wikipedia to illustrate an article on the event in question falls under the "Non-profit educational" clause of the Fair Use doctrine currently upheld by United States law. (17 U.S.C. § 107)
- The image is irreplaceable; a free analogue is impossible to produce as the original will be covered by copyright for the foreseeable future.
- Owing to the limited web-resolution of the image, only a small portion of a copyrighted work is used.
- For the same reasons, the portion of the copyrighted work used is of inherently lower quality than the original, reducing the risk of competitiveness and therefore the effects of this copy on the market for or value of versions held by the owner of the copyright.
- This image is used on various websites, and it was widely broadcast both by the originator, and news organizations, so its use on Wikipedia does not make it significantly more accessible or visible than it already is.
- The image is being used in an informative way and should not detract from the original work, nor does it imply endorsement of the article in question by the subject.
- The image is significant since it not only serves to provide primary illustration of the subject of commentary, (Bin Laden), but it also specifically demonstrates he, and his organization, using the media to capitalize on, and take credit for, the subject of the article -- a process which is of fundamental importance to the narrative of the events.
- It is believed that the use of this image on the English-language Wikipedia to illustrate an article on the event in question falls under the "Non-profit educational" clause of the Fair Use doctrine currently upheld by United States law. (17 U.S.C. § 107)
- The image is irreplaceable; a free analogue is impossible to produce as the original will be covered by copyright for the foreseeable future.
- Owing to the limited web-resolution of the image, only a small portion of a copyrighted work is used.
- For the same reasons, the portion of the copyrighted work used is of inherently lower quality than the original, reducing the risk of competitiveness and therefore the effects of this copy on the market for or value of versions held by the owner of the copyright.
- This image is used on various websites, and it was widely broadcast both by the originator, and news organizations, so its use on Wikipedia does not make it significantly more accessible or visible than it already is.
- The image is being used in an informative way and should not detract from the original work, nor does it imply endorsement of the article in question by the subject.
- The image is significant since it not only serves to provide primary illustration of the subject of commentary, (Bin Laden), but it also specifically demonstrates he, and his organization, using the media to capitalize on, and take credit for, the subject of the article -- a process which is of fundamental importance to the narrative of the events.
- It is believed that the use of this image on the English-language Wikipedia to illustrate an article on the event in question falls under the "Non-profit educational" clause of the Fair Use doctrine currently upheld by United States law. (17 U.S.C. § 107)
- The image is irreplaceable; a free analogue is impossible to produce as the original will be covered by copyright for the foreseeable future.
- Owing to the limited web-resolution of the image, only a small portion of a copyrighted work is used.
- For the same reasons, the portion of the copyrighted work used is of inherently lower quality than the original, reducing the risk of competitiveness and therefore the effects of this copy on the market for or value of versions held by the owner of the copyright.
- This image is used on various websites, and it was widely broadcast both by the originator, and news organizations, so its use on Wikipedia does not make it significantly more accessible or visible than it already is.
- The image is being used in an informative way and should not detract from the original work, nor does it imply endorsement of the article in question by the subject.
- The image is significant since it not only serves to provide primary illustration of the subject of commentary, (Bin Laden), but it also specifically demonstrates he, and his organization, using the media to capitalize on, and take credit for, the subject of the article -- a process which is of fundamental importance to the narrative of the events.
- It is believed that the use of this image on the English-language Wikipedia to illustrate an article on the event in question falls under the "Non-profit educational" clause of the Fair Use doctrine currently upheld by United States law. (17 U.S.C. § 107)
- The image is irreplaceable; a free analogue is impossible to produce as the original will be covered by copyright for the foreseeable future.
- Owing to the limited web-resolution of the image, only a small portion of a copyrighted work is used.
- For the same reasons, the portion of the copyrighted work used is of inherently lower quality than the original, reducing the risk of competitiveness and therefore the effects of this copy on the market for or value of versions held by the owner of the copyright.
- This image is used on various websites, and it was widely broadcast both by the originator, and news organizations, so its use on Wikipedia does not make it significantly more accessible or visible than it already is.
- The image is being used in an informative way and should not detract from the original work, nor does it imply endorsement of the article in question by the subject.
- The image is significant since it not only serves to provide primary illustration of the subject of commentary, (Bin Laden), but it also specifically demonstrates he, and his organization, using the media to capitalize on, and take credit for, the subject of the article -- a process which is of fundamental importance to the narrative of the events.
- It is believed that the use of this image on the English-language Wikipedia to illustrate an article on the person in question falls under the "Non-profit educational" clause of the Fair Use doctrine currently upheld by United States law. (17 U.S.C. § 107)
- The image is irreplaceable; a free analogue is impossible to produce as the original will be covered by copyright for the foreseeable future.
- Owing to the limited web-resolution of the image, only a small portion of a copyrighted work is used.
- For the same reasons, the portion of the copyrighted work used is of inherently lower quality than the original, reducing the risk of competitiveness and therefore the effects of this copy on the market for or value of versions held by the owner of the copyright.
- This image is used on various websites, and it was widely broadcast both by the originator, and news organizations, so its use on Wikipedia does not make it significantly more accessible or visible than it already is.
- The image is being used in an informative way and should not detract from the original work, nor does it imply endorsement of the article in question by the subject.
- The image is significant since it serves to provide primary illustration of the subject of commentary, (Osama bin Laden)
[edit] Licensing
Screeenshot from Osama Bin-Laden tape used for discussion of Osama Bin Laden
 |
This image is a screenshot from a copyrighted video, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the individual or company which produced the video, and possibly also by any actors appearing in the screenshot. It is believed that the use of a limited number of web-resolution screenshots
qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information.
To the uploader: please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use as well as the source of the work and copyright information. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment |
|---|
| current | 22:22, 25 May 2006 | 194×165 (11 KB) | Nortee (Talk | contribs) | |
File links
The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file (pages on other projects are not listed):
