Talk:Billy Cundiff

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Billy Cundiff article.

Article policies
This article is part of WikiProject Kansas City Chiefs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Kansas City Chiefs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary on the comment page to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
football

Billy Cundiff is part of WikiProject College football, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Template:Sart-Class This article has been rated as sart-Class on the quality scale.


This article is part of WikiProject National Football League, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Template:Startimportance=low-Class This article has been rated as startimportance=low-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary on the comment page to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is part of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a WikiProject dedicated to expanding the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the Project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low-importance within Green Bay Packers articles.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

[edit] Good article nomination

[edit] Detractions from GA status

  • It doesn't have an image, and its an article about a person.
  • The prose seems rather bland.

Its got a good start, but it is probably not GA-quality.. yet. Kevin_b_er 23:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Articles doesn't need an image for GA thanks Jaranda wat's sup 23:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm saying it rather ought to considering its about a person who's alive, right now, though I understand its not required for GA. I'm more worried about the bland-like text within it, however. Just doesn't seem to jump out at all. All the references are from today. It just seems like it needs more of something. Kevin_b_er 23:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA assessment

Well-written - Yes, but it is quite brief, which makes it hard for it to be compelling. Logical structure, yes, as far as it goes, but brief again. Technical terms - I'm in a good position to judge this one, I know nothing about American Football - what's an 'All-Iowa'? What's the significance of being a 'free agent'? What's training camp (I can probably guess that one, but I could be wrong!)? Injury waiver? It's hard for me to be interested in this guy because I can't really understand what's happening.

Accurate and verifiable - good, but I can't see a ref for the most field goals record.

Broad coverage - I suppose there's not much more. Perhaps 'Personal Life'?

NPOV - yes, very good.

Stable - yes

Images - No. They're not compulsory, but requirement is worded 'where possible'. Surely it's not impossible here?

In summary then, I'd say it needed a picture, or some more convincing evidence that it's not possible, and a little (very brief) expansion or linking to cover the specialist terms that ignoramuses like me don't know, which seem to be relevant to why his career is taking the turn that it is. I'll mark as 'on hold' for now, pending these changes which should be quite straightforward. It would probably benefit from a bit more content, but that's not a criteria as far as I can see. 4u1e 18:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

I would try to expand it later on, but currently I'm having arm problems and I'm very limited in typing. As for images, all are copyrighted and no free are abvalable. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 19:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

I was sorry to read about that. Hope the physiotherapy helps. 4u1e 21:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC)