Talk:Bill of rights
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Initial comments
- I believe you are looking for this, which is listed in the article's "See also" section: United States Bill of Rights. func(talk) 06:48, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] adding "wiki freedoms" / "wiki bill of rights"
Very badly, this article needs to add a bill of rights for wikipedia.org and its users; or a "wiki bill of rights" ... and next, here are further thoughts about that key, badly needed "bill of right(s)" of all wiki users ... ... (rest - added momentarily pc not working correctly) mity kahuna, sr sufa, jr /s/ 76.195.232.152 (talk) 00:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
<<
-
- repeat pattern, "wiki freedoms" / "wiki "bill of rights"
what the lords of wikipedia do not do and repeatedly allow, is, as seen 1000's of times on wiki, where one, claimed great wiki editor terrorizes another wiki person who has something to say, something to add, and does so in never ending bully fashion;
why wiki allows such "struts" to then continue to not only participate at all, but to dom other wiki participants, makes no sense at all...(take note young James /Jimmy Wales)...
think through, that of 100 % of all wiki contributors, there is not any who are actually adding anything signficiant at all to mankind, esp such lords/ruling editors of individual wiki segments,
and what the wiki actually is, is an opportunity for freedom of expession BY ALL, not to be squelched by a self appointed jackass, who claims supreme knowledge of a tiny segment of info...
so, this is a call for "wiki freedom" and a wiki "bill of rights" for individuals NOT to be savaged by the present, cloned, Wales-generated wiki editor, jackasses >> wiki bill of rights/ wiki freedoms by big willy sr, the great I AM (not to be confused with Muslim tool the Great O Bam)
Lord Willy, Lord Krom - "all wiki participants are equally endowed by the one creator with freedom that a part of that freedom is freedom of expression on wikipedia.org and freedom of expression on wikipedia.org includes freedom from ANY interference whatsoever by "wiki editor strutz(es)" ... and wiki bill of rights freedoms include the necessity for wiki to ban permanently any wiki editor who interrferres with such wiki freedom of expression more than two times
- /s/ the supreme omnisicient ruler, the great Lord Krom, lord of the akashic record , big willy sr -the great creator - the creator of wiki bill of rights 76.192.6.141 (talk) 02:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
aka gm, ps; cmp, kkll /s/ 76.195.232.152 (talk) 00:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- ... I tried to follow that and now my head hurts. A lot. ¥ Jacky Tar 21:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
Clearly been a victim of vandalisation with garbage such as BFF and linking to the bill of lefts. Reverted it to version from December 18 2006. Ryzol 04:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lost content
The first paragraph got lost after a series of vandalism and reverts. It was included last in this version. On January 25th, 68.253.201.232 added a new, different introduction. --Ariovistus 21:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Entrenching a bill of rights
From reading the above last version it seems that for a bill of rights to be entrenched it means it is referred to in a constitution. This is not immediately clear from the current version, where the reference is much more oblique. Maybe a lawyer could add an attempt to explain the scope and definition of the term in laymans terms ('normal personese')? Please? 85.178.71.121 15:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)