Talk:Bilal Skaf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This is a controversial topic that may be under dispute. Please read this page and discuss substantial changes here before making them.
Make sure to supply full citations when adding information and consider tagging or removing uncited/unciteable information.
Flag
Portal
 Bilal Skaf is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime.
Assessment comments


[edit] Choice of words

Second sentence said: "The leader of the group of men who carried out three of the Sydney gang rapes rape attacks that terrorised Sydney in 2000." Apart from not being a sentence and repeating the word rapes/rape, I question the use of the word "terrorised". That is inaccurate, because the crimes were not as widely known before the men were charged. Also, the group of men was not the same each time, so the expression was wrong.

I think it may also have been a calculated means of implying "terrorism" about a Sydney Lebanese Muslim criminal, as the sentence was inserted to link to the problematic Sydney gang rapes article. Racial tensions about Lebanese people led to riots in Sydney in 2005 and there have been racist attempts to paint Islamist terrorism, Skaf's rapes and Middle Eastern gangs as a single problem.

I have changed this to: "He led groups of men who committed three of several gang rape attacks in Sydney in 2000." Tale 00:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hate Crime like it or lump it

Although it surely seems un-PC to you...this is not a clear cut case of a man gang raping women because he is a run of the mill criminal. The facts of the case are that this was a racially motivated hate crime by a muslim lebanese against white australians...and as such this will be forever included in this article. Every single media mention of this crime, and there were dozens upon dozens, notes the racist nature of this crime. So however un-PC it is for a minority to racist against a majority thats simply the facts. So don't even dispute it.--203.208.102.224 14:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

As on Sydney gang rapes, I think you are confusing NPOV with political correctness. I don't think you're fighting PC here - people are just trying to stick the fact of a conviction for rape, not hate crimes. Tale 22:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
It's quite clear that Skaf targetted only non-muslim, anglo women. He revelled in this, taunting his victims, making racist remarks during the course of his attacks. His crimes were not simple sexual gratification - so we can't only focus on the rape - there is more to the story. The simple fact that he now has a rape conviction does not mean that other aspects of the story should be stricken from the article. --Commking 01:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Agreed, but this was about inserting "hate criminal" and "hate crime" into the start and the captions, which is a step beyond letting the facts tell the story. Tale 14:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I think hate crime is appropriate. What else do you need for it to qualify, if you feel this was not a hate crime? --Commking 19:22, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
The apparent position of the gang rapists was that Australian women had loose morals and were more acceptable targets for rape. They picked their targets on an assumption that these women were somehow of less moral worth, combined with a criminal desire to have non-consensual sex. I see a strong difference between that and an outright hate crime, such as targeting them for having white skin. But some people are clearly arguing the definition of hate crime includes these rapes, so I support the phrasing in the Sydney gang rapes article: "The crimes, described as racially motivated hate crimes by commentators such as ...".
My other objection was to the insertion of "hate criminal" and "hate crime" to make a statement, instead of to develop the article. The words "hate criminal" were unnecessarily inserted into every caption on this and the Sydney gang rapes article. Tale 01:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
You have just said women were targetted on the basis of their nationality - not on the basis of having white skin. You see a strong difference between that and outright hate crime? So it's a lesser form of hate crime then, not as much hate? I'm not sure hate crime has to be based on skin colour. I'd would not like to see what Skaf and his mates would do to someone in a real hate crime situation - the mind boggles. An interesting point of view, but I doubt many here would agree. I sure don't. --Commking 04:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Your misunderstanding of this speaks volumes. Bilal Skaf is Australian. He is of the nationality you are talking about. What I wrote about was culture, not race or nationality. The rapists used the term "Australian" girls not as a nationality but as an assumed cultural background, which is what I meant above: the girls were supposedly guilty of low moral standards, not of being white or being Australian citizens. These are crimes linked to a messed-up cultural and religious view, not racial hate.
Look, here's what's wrong with your argument: the only citation you can offer for calling it a "hate crime" is Miranda Devine, a right-wing opinion columnist. Inserting this term is therefore totally against NPOV because the meaning is an opinionated step beyond describing the rapist's motivations - you are adding your own interpretation instead of letting the facts speak for themselves. If you can cite something like a mainstream news story or legal paper that calls these "hate crimes", then go right ahead and insert it and cite it. But until then, the term has no place in the article apart from saying something like "some commentators such as Miranda Devine have called the rapes hate crimes". Tale 12:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
OK I have cited your beloved Miranda Devine article and used "described by some as hate crimes" in the intro. I hope you are happy with that, because Miranda herself uses "hate crimes" in the context of saying she believes that's what the media would have called them if the media was of her view, i.e. her own point is that nobody called them "hate crimes" except her. Tale 12:52, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
"My" Miranda Divine article? You're confused - I never cited it - I've never even heard of her. So it's not a hate crime, because he only cited their "culture" as a reason to attack them? I think you've confused "hate-crime" with racism. I'm sure those girls will feel relieved knowing that it was nothing personal against them, just their degenerate culture he attacked. --Commking 20:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
203.208.102.224 inserted the words "hate crime" into opening paragraphs and captions on this and related articles, taking his cue from the Miranda Devine article. That's what started this as an NPOV discussion, here and on Sydney gang rapes, so I presumed you knew.
Another example of what I am trying to explain is the title of the recently-released book by Paul Sheehan about a similar case. It's called "Girls like you" (from "Girls like you, I know how to fix them up"), taken from what a rapist said to a victim. The warped belief of the criminals was roughly "these women are sluts and this is how they should be treated", not "this is how we can damage Australians". Tale 09:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
The girls that were attacked were selected and targetted because of their skin colour - that makes it a hate crime, surely. Wikipedi'a own definition of hate crime supports this. Many people disagree (I am not sure why race based attacks are not hate crimes, but I look forward to hearing why exactly) we will should at the very least be happy with the article saying that some people consider these attacks to be hate crimes. --Commking 01:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)