User:Bike40/sandbox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Wikipedia:Assume bad faith
[edit] Mansour (talk · contribs)
- "Rv. That is just BS. HKT is a Zionist who spreads anti-Iranian lies and scare-tactics for his Zionist purposes. He has done it on a number of Iran-related articles along with his gang" [1] 04:37, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
- "HKT you are a Zionist and you are the one who has introduced all the allegations to Ahmadinejad into this article. And you are "protecting" your evil here. Wonder why all humanity hates you vermin." [2] 06:44, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- "Wikipedia is not a Zionist organization (not yet anyway). Take your lies with you and go among your own "Chosen People"." [3] 07:33, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- "User:Jayjg and User:HKT are prejudiced Zionists (their edit history speaks for itself) and they are abusing Wikipedia." [4] 05:05, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Witkacy (talk · contribs)
- "HKT - please dont make fun of the massacres of Tutsis in Rwanda." [5] 22:25, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- "Ten HKT chyba nie dazy Polske wielka sympatia..." [6] 07:13, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- In response to German Eastern Marches Society joke by User:Radomil (see below): "Rzeczywiscie pasuje ;)" [7] 10:43, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- "HKT is the short name for the Deutscher Ostmarkenverein." [8] 15:35, 9 July 2005
[edit] SylwiaS (talk · contribs)
- "I hope you understand that HKT gave you this particular barnstar only to ridicule Polish people." [9] 14:35, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Radomil (talk · contribs)
- "Zapewne to nadinterpretacja, ale HKT kojarzy mi się z panami Hansemannem, Kennemannem i Tiedemannem." [10] 07:56, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Ttyre (talk · contribs)
- "Czołem, potrzebuje poparcia: Anti-Semitism in Poland dyskusja i artykul. Niestety jest to znowu HKT." [11] 19:37, 2 June 2005 (UTC)
- "HKT, the fact that you are grabbing the suspect sources to support your position shows me only the depth of your (probably) bigoted opinions on the matter of Polish WWII collaboration with the German Nazis." [12] 16:14, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Referring to HKT's comments (see previous link): "Consequently, sometimes I do call and challenge editors when the Wikipedia:Civility rules are being violated (see Soapboxing? discussion in Talk:Anti-Semitism)." [13] 10:00, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Assume good faith
[edit] With Mansour
- "I apologize, Mansour. I meant to take out the "taken part in" phrase as part of the new wording. This clarification should be fine now." [14] HKT 17:06, 8 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] With Witkacy
- "Hi, Piotr. Please see Witkacy's recent involvement with the wiki articles censorship and Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I think it may be a good idea if you could discuss the situation with him. I'm confident that your involvement would be much appreciated by all involved parties. Thank you." [15] HKT 8 July 2005 22:59 (UTC)
[edit] With Radomil
No interaction to date.
[edit] With SylwiaS
- "Hi, Sylwia. I noticed on Moritz's talk page that you had changed the barnstar. That's fine; I wouldn't want to keep it if it was offensive to anyone. As far as why I chose that barnstar, it was because the discussion was about anti-Polonism. It was meant to be cute, but I didn't mean to ridicule Polish people. In fact, there was only one editor whose provocations Moritz was resisting. I wasn't trying to say that Moritz needs to exercise restraint in the face of personal provocations from Polish editors in general (is that what you thought I meant?). Anyway, I hope this clears things up." [16] HKT 14:51, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] With Ttyre
- "You assert that Wein is a "propagandists author," and you link to his site without substantiating your assertion. Essentially, your argument seems to be circular. Something like: "Since I view his quotes as not credible, he must be a propogandist author. Since he's a propogandist, his work isn't credible." (Either that or you think that, as a rabbi, he must, of course, be a propogandist). The reason why you won't find his book in the UC network is probably because his book is meant as a popularization of Jewish history (which essentially means it brings a much less in-depth account of Jewish history; his Triumph, which covers around 300 yrs. of history, is just short of 500 pages). This has little bearing on fundamental accuracy." [17] HKT 03:14, 28 July 2005 (UTC)