User talk:Bigz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] What's up/Sta ima?

Hey, thanks for joing my project. If you need help, such as adding templates to your page, simply ask.

Hvala sto si se uclanio na projekat koji sam ja poceo. U koliko imas pitanja ili trebas pomoc samo upitaj.

(No need to delete your messages/Nema potrebe da brises poruke)

Greetings, pozdrav Kseferovic 02:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Да ли сте сигуран да је Харис Силајџић рођен у Сарајеву? Дуго вријеме је био град Бреза на чланку и зато питам. Evlekis 15:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Don't smear my talk page with cyrilicBigz 00:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I had no idea that you could not read Cyrillic. There is no indication of this. I may be excused for thinking that you could since you belong to a project based on a country to which Cyrillic is used co-officially. Either way, it is not important now. If you do not like the content, I take no offence in you removing it permanently from your talk page. I do however take offence when people remove my contributions as you did on Haris Silajdzic. I have restored it, but in a way that I have not interfered with your edits. You only have the right to remove passages if they are forms of vandalism; I do not vandalise nor disrupt talk pages with nonsense. If the details are erroneous, you may edit them replacing incorrect details with correct details by proving sources. If the details are correct but do not belong on that page, you may "move" the passage onto the relevant page. As for "dumb observation", just because you feel this information is dumb, it does not automaticly mean that all Wikipedians do. If the content is that bad, I am sure others will remove it, but given that nobody has touched the Nebojsa Radmanovic page which has the same passage in reflection, I may assume that it is not considered irrelevant. Many articles have "Trivia" sections. These may be kept at the bottom of the page after all serious writing is out of the way, these may include such observations. I mean who actually cares about Milo Djukanovic being over 1,90cm tall? He is only a country leader now, not a basketball player any more. The Silajdzic page is biographical, and as information about his life emerges, it may be placed on the article. The Trivia, along with other trivial features can go on the end. If you have a problem with this, good luck in deleting ALL Trivia sections on all articles, you will however lose that battle. If you remove my contributions again then I will report your actions as vandalism. Евлекис October 31, 2006

[edit] Mostar

Please do not fraudulently add {{featured article}} to articles that aren't featured, as you did to Mostar. It is harmful to Wikipedia's reputation when a bad article is falsely presented to readers as being one of Wikipedia's best. --estavisti 17:19, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks,

Yes I try to keep the neutrality in the articles. Just so you know Bosanski Brod and Bosanska Kostajnica are official and are even said so by the government of RS. Also, do not forget that names for cases like Dubica are important as well. Both happen to be applicable for Bosanska Dubica. Greetings, (if you want to vote for me to become an admin then sign here Vseferović 02:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit]  ?

"Don't smear my talk page with cyrilic"? :D LOL --PaxEquilibrium 12:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stop!~

Please stop creating articles such as Nikola Špirić if you cannot add the proper sort keys so that the articles are indexed properly in categories. I fixed that one. Go back and fix any others you have messed up the same way. Gene Nygaard 18:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Categorization#Category sorting, which explains how the sort keys work. They look like piping in a wikilink, but don't work the same way. And this edit where I fixed the one mentioned above. Gene Nygaard 00:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Zabih.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Zabih.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Razglednica6_copy.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Razglednica6_copy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:SDAflag.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SDAflag.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Oric.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Oric.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 17:01, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:StrankaZABiH.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:StrankaZABiH.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:StrankaZABiH.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:StrankaZABiH.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Debate on the correct adjective for Kosovo

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion 15:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AvazCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AvazCover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chris B • talk • contribs 16:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:SvenAlkalaj.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SvenAlkalaj.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:CelicGrb.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CelicGrb.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:JablanicaGrb.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:JablanicaGrb.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 14:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Makarska.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Makarska.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oslobodjenje.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Oslobodjenje.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UTuzlalogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:UTuzlalogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ba-92a.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ba-92a.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UTuzlalogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:UTuzlalogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Unsalogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Unsalogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Avdopalic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Avdopalic.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:BiH Municipality

A tag has been placed on Template:BiH Municipality requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bosniaks

Greetings. I've noticed you are one of the editors who has edited the Bosniaks article. I was wondering if you would have any input into a few "revert wars" happening lately over there. Here's a diff. Personally, I think the changes are biased, a little racist/xenophobic, but mostly, they are wrong.

P.S, I've sent this message to a few of the users I've seen in the talk page history to try to get a discussion started. 121.222.199.140 (talk) 10:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:SvenAlkalaj.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Bigz!
We thank you for uploading Image:SvenAlkalaj.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:37, 24 April 2008 (UTC)