User talk:BigDom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 New userboxes 2 Flavio Roma 3 Marco Di Vaio 4 French club templates 4.1 Template:Angers SCO Squad 4.2 Template:AS Beauvais Squad 5 Categories 6 Image tagging for Image:Rochefourchat.jpg 7 Image tagging for Image:VictoriaParkNelson.jpg 8 Image copyright problem with Image:DavidIrvingCoach.jpg 9 Dave thomas 10 Chalon 11 Unblock request 12 Geoffrey Dauphy 13 French football 14 WP Munich 15 Brazil national football team players' caps and goals 16 Fair use rationale for Image:MicahHyde.jpg 17 St Albans City 18 Michael Pollitt and 0 template 19 AfD Nomination: Noureddine Maamria 20 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wilmington Hammerheads.png) 21 Orphaned fair use image (Image:OlympiqueSQ.gif) 22 Orphaned fair use image (Image:CEMataró.jpeg) 23 F.C. 24 Rikki Bains 25 Invite 26 "Dom" 27 Eintracht Frankfurt edits 28 Non-free use disputed for Image:Golden Skans.jpg 29 Fair use rationale for Image:EAGuingamp.gif 30 Youth club information 31 Image Insert 32 Image:We_Danced_Together.jpg 33 Image:TheWorldWas.jpg 34 Image Tagging 35 Image:Paris_FC.jpg 36 Image:WorriedAboutRay.jpg 37 Image:Torn_on_the_Platform.jpg 38 Edits to football infoboxes 39 Some (hopefully) helpful hints 40 July 2007 41 LB Châteauroux 42 Fair use rationale for Image:Image:TVEC.gif 43 Fair use rationale for Image:TVEC.gif 44 Fair use rationale for Image:CDCovadonga.jpeg 45 Image source problem with Image:ACCambrésien.gif 46 Image source problem with Image:ACMeda.jpeg 47 Image source problem with Image:AmiensSC.gif 48 Image source problem with Image:ArrasFootball.gif 49 Image source problem with Image:AurillacFCA.jpg 50 Image source problem with Image:AvironBayonnais.jpg 51 Image source problem with Image:BalmaSC.gif 52 Image source problem with Image:CA Bastia.gif 53 Image source problem with Image:CalaisRUFC.jpg 54 Appearance data 55 Football Infobox style 56 TfD nomination of Template:Virginia Beach Mariners squad 57 Fair use rationale for Image:ÉFBastia.gif 58 Fair use rationale for Image:SC Schiltigheim.gif 59 Elliott Benyon 60 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LetMeIn.jpg 61 Chad Dombrowski 62 Joe Barton (soccer) 63 Derek Potteiger 64 Thabiso Khumalo 65 Ryan Mack 66 AfD nomination of Chad Dombrowski 67 Speedy deletion of Template:Burnley Football Club 68 Speedy deletion of Template:AS Beauvais squad 69 Speedy deletion of Template:Championnat de France Amateurs Group A teamlist 70 Fair use rationale for Image:22GrandJob.jpg 71 Orphaned non-free media (Image:GiveUp.jpg) 72 Orphaned non-free media (Image:HHHChristmas.jpg) 73 Orphaned non-free media (Image:IslandoftheHonestMan.jpg) 74 Fair use rationale for Image:Bandages.jpg

[edit] New userboxes

Per the terms of the German userbox solution new userboxes should not be created in template space. Please read up on the current practices. That page has instructions on how to properly create userfied userboxes. --Cyde Weys 20:38, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Flavio Roma

Your change to the page Flavio Roma was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Matt86hk talk 11:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Marco Di Vaio

Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Marco Di Vaio. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.. He was call-up 21 times but only made 14 appearances, per http://www.figc.it -Matt86hk talk 20:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

And the capitalisation and italicisation of the players' names atop the infobox doesn't look good at all. Not sure who told you it did, but I'd suggest not doing it any more than you already have. ~ Dudesleeper 19:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

And still you continue to do it. Are you trying to imitate Sky Sports? ~ Dudesleeper 12:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

It is not me who does it, it is my brother. I have told him not to do it that way on my username anymore. BigDom 11:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

please see categories of Mickaël Le Mener.

[edit] French club templates

[edit] Template:Angers SCO Squad

Hi, I've changed the style of your Angers template. If you prefer the old version, feel free to change it back, since there isn't an approved style for numberless squads. Laters.  sʟυмɢυм • т • c  01:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:AS Beauvais Squad

Are the players professional? If they're not, they wouldn't merit an article, and this template would be rendered useless. At the moment, it is already useless without any player articles.  sʟυмɢυм • т • c  22:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Categories

Please categorize your articles. Thanks, Punkmorten 15:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Rochefourchat.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rochefourchat.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:VictoriaParkNelson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VictoriaParkNelson.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:DavidIrvingCoach.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DavidIrvingCoach.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dave thomas

thank you for creating the Dave Thomas article. I am a pupil at bishop luffa and i appreciate you re-creating the article after my version was deleted DARReN^TALK 11:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem BigDom 19:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chalon

The club in CFA-2, groupe C, named "Chalon" is "FC Chalon" from Chalon-sur-Saône (Haute-Saône), not "CO Châlons" from Châlons-en-Champagne (Aube).

The club "CO Châlons" is defunct, and replaced by "Olympique Châlons" whose senior team plays in Division d'honneur régionale (groupe B), in the Champagne-Ardennes League (tier 7)

Sources : http://www.fff.fr Sojah 22:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock request

Hi BigDom!

I've removed the autoblock that was restricting your ability to edit. I'm sorry for the trouble this caused you.

If this happens again, please put the unblock request on this page (your talk page) as this makes replying easier and also shaves several minutes off the process of unblocking you!

Thanks for your understanding, sorry for the autoblock, and happy editing! ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Geoffrey Dauphy

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Geoffrey Dauphy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Geoffrey Dauphy. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 11:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I am currently going through your contributions, as inbetween the many good articles about notable subjects, there seem to be a number of articles on non notable subjects as well. I have prodded the above, I have nominated a bunch of others for AfD, and I also nominated one template for deletion. It may be best if you go through your watchlist and check out which ones I'll be nominating (I don't know yet if any more will follow). I don't think we should have articles about amateur footballers who have no other claim to notability (former pro's and so on are of course still notable, no matter where they play now). Fram 11:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] French football

Hi BigDom, thanks for all you additions about French football - it is an area I've done a fair bit of editing too, creating articles for the more important clubs or players in France and hoping someone else would create pages for the players/clubs in the next tier of importance in the French leagues. Thanks a lot for doing my "work" for me! It makes me chuffed to see someone else doing what I do, and I can now go off on an extended holiday knowing "my" Wikipedia articles are going to be in safe hands. Hey man, you should feel priviliged, coz you're the last person I'm ever going to leave a message to on Wikipedia. --Dangherous 00:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP Munich

Kingjeff 23:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brazil national football team players' caps and goals

Hi BigDom, I notice you have corrected several brazillian players international caps and goals. From your edit I think that you use the website sambafoot.com as a source (please correct me if I'm wrong), however, I found several mistakes that sambafoot.com has on their statistics. I have point out their mistakes and how to get the correct caps in the Brazil national football team talk page. -- Martin tamb 06:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:MicahHyde.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MicahHyde.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] St Albans City

Just to say I'm well impressed with all the work you've done. Ram4eva 14:49, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Pollitt and 0 template

Hi, I was wandering why you removed the 0 template from Michael Pollitt's article. Thanks. -- Mattythewhite 17:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD Nomination: Noureddine Maamria

An editor has nominated the article Noureddine Maamria for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noureddine Maamria. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Noureddine Maamria during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 13:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wilmington Hammerheads.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wilmington Hammerheads.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:OlympiqueSQ.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:OlympiqueSQ.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:CEMataró.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CEMataró.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] F.C.

If you can, remember to put "F.C." after a football club's name to avoid article re-directs. You did it for some of the clubs in the infobox of Colin Hendry's article but not all. Danke. - Dudesleeper · Talk 14:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rikki Bains

A tag has been placed on Rikki Bains, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Springnuts 19:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Invite

Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject England. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to England related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Project Page!. Thank You.

[edit] "Dom"

So.. your name is just Dom? Is it short for anything? Just wonderin.. Since my name is Dominic and I go by Dom

Domthedude001 03:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

My name is Dominic but I only like being called Dom. BigDom 15:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eintracht Frankfurt edits

Hi, Dom! I noticed some of your edits on Eintracht internationalists. I got a question on your Vasoski edit. Germany's most respectable football magazine kicker has another opinion on the club affiliation. [1]What is your source? By the way: I was always looking for a page with stats for domestic caps like you seem to have found one. Regards. -Lemmy- 13:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I got them off www.rsssf.com but it only shows the record caps and goals. User:BigDom

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Golden Skans.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Golden Skans.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:EAGuingamp.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:EAGuingamp.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 00:52, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Youth club information

Hey Dom, I see you have been deleting some information on youth clubs for several football players like Gianni Zuiverloon and Rob van Dijk for instance. Can you tell me why? Knurftendans 19:35, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image Insert

Hi Big Dom I have corrected your Image insert, you forgot to wrap the text and give it a size for pixels. If you have a look at the alteration I have made you will see where you need to make the correction for next time. 86.129.55.200 17:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I think you will find that by changing it, you actually ruined the page as writing the pixel size is unnecessary in single infoboxes. I have changed the page back to make it right again. BigDom 17:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:We_Danced_Together.jpg

I have tagged Image:We_Danced_Together.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 17:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:TheWorldWas.jpg

I have tagged Image:TheWorldWas.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 17:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging

I would be happy to stop tagging your new images as "No fair use rationale". However, you need to include a fair use rationale when you upload the images. Please review the fair use rationale guideline for information about what constitutes a fair use rationale. If you have any questions about that, I am happy to help. ~ BigrTex 17:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Paris_FC.jpg

I have tagged Image:Paris_FC.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:WorriedAboutRay.jpg

I have tagged Image:WorriedAboutRay.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Torn_on_the_Platform.jpg

I have tagged Image:Torn_on_the_Platform.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edits to football infoboxes

Hi, reverted your edit to David Brown (footballer) as his article clearly states that he was an apprentice with Manchester United, so that's who he played for as a youth (it's not meant to mean that only youth teams go in that box).

Also, not sure why, but you deleted the {{0}}'s from Roscoe D'Sane. They are there to align the numbers in the box, so I reverted it back as well. WikiGull 16:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Some (hopefully) helpful hints

Hi. Have a few pointers for you which might improve your articles on football players. First up is that when using the fc template you should be substituting it. For example, rather than writing {{fc|Accrington Stanley}} it's better to write {{subst:fc|Accrington Stanley}}. Gives the same thing, but avoids the template having to work every time. Also, if you use {{0}} in the infobox you can align the numbers, as I said in my message above.

Finally, with the categories you can use the DEFAULTSORT template to avoid having to type the players name on each line. If you look at what I did to Mark Roberts (footballer), you'll hopefully see what I'm getting at.

Hope this is useful WikiGull 10:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Tiddly Tom 16:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] LB Châteauroux

Thank you for your edits to the LB Châteauroux article. I see that you have updated the Current squad list from 2006/2007 to 2007/2008. Some of the players shown in the Dual Nationality sub-section do not agree with the current squad section. Since you seem to be familiar with this club, would you please correct this. Thanks. Truthanado 14:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Image:TVEC.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Image:TVEC.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:TVEC.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TVEC.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:CDCovadonga.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:CDCovadonga.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alx 91 03:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:ACCambrésien.gif

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:ACCambrésien.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 11:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:ACMeda.jpeg

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:ACMeda.jpeg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 11:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:AmiensSC.gif

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:AmiensSC.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 18:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:ArrasFootball.gif

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:ArrasFootball.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:AurillacFCA.jpg

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:AurillacFCA.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:AvironBayonnais.jpg

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:AvironBayonnais.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 10:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:BalmaSC.gif

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BalmaSC.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:CA Bastia.gif

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:CA Bastia.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:CalaisRUFC.jpg

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:CalaisRUFC.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Appearance data

I've just noticed you've changed the appearance data for various players. Is this for this afternoon's games? There's nothing too wrong I suppose from doing it, but just beware in case they're abandoned for whatever reason. Peanut4 15:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Football Infobox style

Hi, just a quick note regarding your recent edit to James O'Connor (footballer). The word 'loan' should not be in italics, as per the Wikipedia Football Project Player Manual of Style. Cheers. --Jameboy 11:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Virginia Beach Mariners squad

Template:Virginia Beach Mariners squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — ArtVandelay13 20:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ÉFBastia.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ÉFBastia.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 23:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:SC Schiltigheim.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SC Schiltigheim.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 01:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Elliott Benyon

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Elliott Benyon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. ArtVandelay13 15:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LetMeIn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LetMeIn.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chad Dombrowski

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Chad Dombrowski, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Joe Barton (soccer)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Joe Barton (soccer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Derek Potteiger

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Derek Potteiger, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thabiso Khumalo

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Thabiso Khumalo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ryan Mack

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ryan Mack, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Chad Dombrowski

An editor has nominated Chad Dombrowski, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Dombrowski and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Burnley Football Club

A tag has been placed on Template:Burnley Football Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:AS Beauvais squad

A tag has been placed on Template:AS Beauvais squad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Championnat de France Amateurs Group A teamlist

A tag has been placed on Template:Championnat de France Amateurs Group A teamlist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:22GrandJob.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:22GrandJob.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:GiveUp.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GiveUp.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:HHHChristmas.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:HHHChristmas.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:IslandoftheHonestMan.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:IslandoftheHonestMan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bandages.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bandages.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)