User talk:BigCoop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dickdonato.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dickdonato.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dick Donato
Please do not create a separate article for Dick Donato. He does not meet the requirements of WP:BIO. Plus, the conclusion of the article's speedy deletion was to merge. DO NOT create another article about this non-notable person. This is an encyclopedia not a fan site. Thank you. - Jeeny Talk 02:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
HA! He does meet the requirements, and It was proven, thats why the page was passed as meeting the requirements! Please review WP:BIO over again! BigCoop 07:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dick Donato AFD
I posted this in reply to your comment on the AFD page, but wanted to make sure that you saw it. First of all, you (and other editors) picked up on some attitude in my last comment. That is unfortunate. I really didn't mean to have one. Secondly, I was wrong. I had thought you were referring to the nom's comments when you said "up there". Which is why I mentioned all of that other stuff. Because I am sure you know it is suggested that you don't say "...per nom" on an AFD discussion, which you did not. My mistake. I apologize for all of that. - Rjd0060 18:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
