Talk:Big hair
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] What the hell!?
Is this article needed? (usigned comment added by User:Blackfield)
Seems kinda trivial, but there's quite a few articles on specific hair styles. Rklawton 20:29, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- I don't consider "big hair" a specific hairstyle.--Blackfield 18:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
If you are doing a project on fahsion history, and the styling of hair and how it has changed, this article is very useful. And if you didnt think so why did you look it up in the first place? I just think someone should add how people in the 18th century got their hair like that, that's why i looked it up.
And if you read the article your implied complaint is answered. Exploding Boy 19:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- This article is stupid. Who has ever had the need to find information about "big hair", and if you mean that the articles deal with different hair styles, there are already articles that deal with them exclusively.--Blackfield 19:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Who has ever had the need to find information about "big hair"
- I would think that an individual looking for information on the history of hairstyles or hairstyling (or even fashions from the past) could find this informative. --Ethii 10:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, the article is ridiculous. Someone oughta nominate it for deletion. I would if I could be bothered! Damiancorrigan 23:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image
To avoid an edit war, I will post here. I believe that Monica Lewinsky is not the ideal candidate for "big hair" as is believed by a certain editor. I think someone such as Dolly Parton would be a better candidate for an image in this article. I'd like to change this as it seems reasonable enough. --Ethii 17:37, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- I checked with Google - and you're right at 10:1.Rklawton 19:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
This is stupidstupid.--Blackfield 15:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] History
Should be some pointer to historical "big hair" -- the 1770's put the 1960's to shame... Churchh 14:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Second this, large wigs and big hair were popular throughout time and a section for say, 17th century hairstyles would be informative. --Ethii 09:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Claudio
Why isn't there a picture of Claudio Sanchez in the article. I think he pretty much defines big hair in the 21st century.
- Because this article is ridiculous.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:JohnnySlut.jpg
Image:JohnnySlut.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
