Talk:Big Brother 2006 (UK)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Big Brother 2006 (UK) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Big Brother 2006 (UK) article.

Article policies
To-do:
  • Trim down/rewrite the lead
  • Rewrite the housemates section
  • Comment on here for improvements to the weekly summary
  • Add a themes section
  • Trim down/rewrite the criticism
  • Get some sources other than from the Channel 4 website.
  • Remove the first link (it is no longer active)
The Big Brother WikiProject aims to improve articles relating to Big Brother, and Big Brother 2006 (UK) has been identified as one of these articles. Anybody can help the WikiProject by trying to improve existing articles. Please add your name to the list of participants, if you are committed to helping out.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Archive

Archives


Nominations table

Contents

[edit] The Eviction & Percentage Table

moved from Talk:Big Brother (UK series 7) Tra (Talk) 19:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I did start the Percentage & Vote part. Do we really need the horrific colour coding? The table will look much better without the Red, Blue and Green Colours as the background. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coreix (talkcontribs)

For comparison, here's the current table:
And here's how it would look without the coloured backgrounds:
Tra (Talk) 19:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I prefer it with the colours. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 21:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

--- Neither are grade. Hopefully we can find an alternative method.

[edit] Eviction Table - Discussion (2)

Ok I got bored so the Eviction Table right now is really cramp. Can we maybe move the setting. I created this in frontpage. {{Was lazy to do it on Wiki, and nor am I good at it lol}}

Image:eviction-table.jpg —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Coreix (talkcontribs) 17:02, January 12, 2007 (UTC)

I like it, but I think the housemates in the final week should all have a separate row. J Di 17:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

It's well-written, well sourced, and all the images have fair use rationale. I wasn't sure about the charts, but the article does need them. I grant this article GA status. Good work! -- Scorpion 18:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA revoked

I have removed this article from the GA list becasue-

  • too much "in-universe" context (eg. Day 43 should be replaced with a real date, such as July 27, or this date should be added into the article with the "Day" also)
  • Some sources are no longer active (eg. 1 and 21) and some do not have all of the necessary fields filled in (eg. 49)
  • there is not 1 reference at all in the lead. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 14:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
With Big Brother seasons/series referring to something that happened on a certain day like "On Day xx two housemates were nominated for eviction." Is a lot more concise than having this "On June xx ..." Alucard 16 18:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] geek task

no mention of the geek task in week 2? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.84.156 (talk) 12:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)