Big Dumb Object
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A term used in discussing science fiction, "Big Dumb Object" (BDO) refers to any mysterious object (usually of extraterrestrial or otherwise unknown origin and of absolutely immense power) in a story which generates an intense sense of wonder just by being there; to a certain extent, the term deliberately deflates this. Probably coined by reviewer Roz Kaveney[1], the term was not in general use until it was included in The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction as a joke by Peter Nicholls[2].
J.G. Ballard's short story, "Report on an Unidentified Space Station" (1982) may be regarded as an exploration of the metaphor of the BDO: in each successive report, the artifact's estimated size increases, people become lost within it.
[edit] Appearances
This article or section may contain poor or irrelevant examples. Articles should only contain pertinent examples. Please improve the article or discuss proposed changes on the talk page. You can edit the article to add more encyclopaedic text. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for further suggestions. |
- Arthur C. Clarke's monolith in 2001: A Space Odyssey
- Michael Crichton's Sphere in Sphere
- Peter F. Hamilton's Sleeping God in The Night's Dawn Trilogy
- The Ultimate Evil from the film, The Fifth Element
- John Varley's Gaea from the "Gaea Trilogy".
- The Nothing from the film "The Neverending Story".
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ Kaveney, Roz, 1981, Foundation: The International Review of Science Fiction, issue 22.
- ^ Nicholls, Peter, 2000, Big Dumb Objects and Cosmic Enigmas: The Love Affair between Space Fiction and the Transcendental, in Westfahl, Gary (ed), Space and Beyond: The Frontier Theme in Science Fiction, Greenwood Press, p. 13. "... I decided to write an April Fool's entry. I would pretend that a phrase I’d always liked, originated by the critic Roz Kaveney but not in general use, was actually a known critical term. I would write an entry called "Big Dumb Objects" in a poker-faced style, suggesting an even more absurd critical term to be used in its place, "megalotropic sf.""