User talk:BiAndBi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear BiAndBi: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk (discussion) page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!  

[edit] Invitation to join WP:LGBT

Thought you might be interested in WP:LGBT. If you are, please feel free to sign up. Thanks! -- 07:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks to whoever this is, feel greatly honored to have been asked, however at this time must decline since don't feel there is enough time that could be devoted to this important and worthwhile project. Perhaps sometime in the future. BiAndBi 07:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:BiAnyOtherName.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BiAnyOtherName.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BI Mental Health...

Ah it is 6:30, I have been up since 4:30 I can't remember the name of the page even though I looked at less than two minutes ago. you know what I am talking about - you left a message on my talk page about it. Listen, you very well could be right about what you said on my page. But realize, you can't reprod an article. The best you can do is take it to AFD. I suggest pushing an admin to merge the article with Sheila Lambert as has been suggested which will have the same effect as deleting the page.Postcard Cathy 10:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

I took a quick look at the Sheela Lambert article what seems like a lifetime ago and saw a reference to the group there... As long as it is listed there, whatever you have done to the main article on the assoc. is fine with me! Postcard Cathy 23:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shared accounts

Hi, you may remember I commented in the discussion you started at WP:RFCN. I was confused when you kept saying "we", because shared accounts are disallowed. I'm not sure how you want to handle it, but more than one person shouldn't have access to a single account. Is there a reason you can't open two separate accounts? Leebo T/C 15:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here. I was attempting to keep the discussion in one place. Leebo T/C 19:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Framline link

Thanks biandbi for your comment on my talk page. Thanks for making this edit - seems entirely appropriate to me! Thanks also for the tip on the talk function. Sexperts 18:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Peer review/Sheela Lambert

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Peer review/Sheela Lambert, by SatyrTN (talk ยท contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Peer review/Sheela Lambert fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Housekeeping. This is not a peer review. I'm moving these comments to the talk page of the article.


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Peer review/Sheela Lambert, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)