Talk:Biathlon at the 2006 Winter Olympics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Biathlon at the 2006 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
March 19, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

	Biathlon at the 2006 Winter Olympics is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	Olympics Portal
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article is on a subject of Mid priority within inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
Olympics To-do: edit  The assessment department of the Olympics WikiProject needs your help assessing articles! If this article is unassessed, please assess it. See the instructions for more information on how to help, or go to the project's discussion page if you have a doubt on a rating. Add full results for events of the: Summer Olympics (from 1924 to 2004) Winter Olympics (from 1924 to 2002) Articles need improvements: 2016 Summer Olympics 2016 Summer Olympics bids

[edit] GA review

I really should be careful about reviewing articles that are part of WikiProjects I'm involved with, but I reviewed this article and I believe it is of GA quality. Good job! -- Scorpion 17:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but don't worry, almost any well-made and reasonably sourced article gets GA status... it's the FAC what matters the most ;). So now we have more GAs in a few days than in 5 years. Parutakupiu ^{talk || contribs} 17:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

And I'm the one who has promoted all 3 of them... Which is why I should be careful. -- Scorpion 17:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, in that case you should. Anyways, I don't think GAC is one bit as restricted and demanding as FAC. That's why I'd prefer to "spice up" the article with a peer-review, which stands for the GA-review perfectly, then get an A-Class project assessment and finally attempt a FAC. Parutakupiu ^{talk || contribs} 17:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

...Funny how that works... haha! Thanks. Maybe we'll just keep you to pass our GACs! Haha, just kidding. _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐  17:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)