User talk:Bgully

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bgully

Contents

[edit] User Dbachmann vandalizes by redirection

Since he was unsuccessfull in deleting the page (the other editors voted to keep), now User:Dbachmann permanently vandalizes the 2 pages with help of a small, but active and hate presenting clique, by redirection:

and

  • Please let me know, what is the right method to stop User:Dbachmann's vandalization and mis-use of his administrator rights.
  • He let delete the rfc pertaining his and his clique's vandalization and he continues vandalizing.

I need that rfc page at least reconstructed on my discussion page, I did not think, it will be that easily deleted. Thanks.

  • I do not think, rights misusing admininstrators, like User:Dbachmann and small hate cliques are a good reclam for open projects, that require money and lot of intellectual work from users. Also vandalized informational pages are not a good reclam.

Thanks, Bgully 09:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

  • User Bishonen, one of the dbachman hate clique removed this notice.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=44278801&oldid=44277815


We are not talking about "supposed vandalism", we are talking about real vandalism.
I strongly disagree with removing notices and trying to hide administrators misuse and vandalization. Fact is, that user dbachmann permamnently vandalizes the mentioned pages and misuses his administrator rights. It is an absolutely annoying behaviour of anybody to support vandalismus and admin rights misuse. Bgully 07:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Fact is also, that no editor had the chance to work on those linguistic pages, because of the vandalization of dbachmann. Nobody hindered constructive work on those linguistic pages, except of dbachmann thru vandalization.

[edit] User Bishonen illegally removes administrator noticeboard incident notice

Bgully 07:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request For Comment Dbachmann

Dear BorgQueen, On page http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Dbachmann I saw: 13:03, 10 March 2006 BorgQueen deleted "Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Dbachmann" (deleting bad faith rfc as per requests at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents)

  • Where can I find the records in Administrations' noticeboard requesting deletion? Bgully 09:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Can you please put a copy of the Requests_for_comment/Dbachmann page onto my discussion page? I did not save it, since I never thought, it can be deleted without comment. Thanks, Bgully 09:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
The request is at: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive80#Antifinnugor. I suggest you solve any misunderstanding on WP:AN/I before I place a copy of it on your talk page, if the RFC wasn't made in bad faith. --BorgQueen 10:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Antifinnugor

bad faith rfc, posted by Bgully (talk • contribs), apparently a sock of formerly banned Antifinnugor (talk • contribs) (as Adam88 (talk • contribs)). Please delete the rfc and permaban the sock. dab (ᛏ) 08:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, please do. I'd do it, except that I've also been involved with Antifinnugor before. I helped bring the old (but wild) RFC on him, that led to his being banned, and was (therefore) more recently honored with input from him on the Requests for comment/Bishonen brought by User:Hollow Wilerding. But I guess he hates dab even more than me. Somebody please kill this noisome absurdity with a stick. Bishonen | ノート 09:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC).
I've deleted it, but perhaps the permanent ban would better be done by more experienced admin. --BorgQueen 13:04, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
While we're at it, whoever deals with Adam88/Bgully might also want to consider this choice little personal attack on me: [1]. Lukas (T.|@) 09:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

and User:Bishonen, who is just a clique member, obvouosly full of hatred, that shows clearly in his personal attacks against others.

  • I think, it is not correct, that User:Dbachmann vandalizes pages, he does not like, and ignores the will of the other editors. Please reconstruct that page, since it need open debate. I do not think, an open project as the Wikipedia can tolerate hate actions and open vandalization, as he practices it.

[edit] About User:Bishonen "illegally" removing your posts

Nope, I'm not, Antifinnugor. (I notice you don't even bother to deny who you are. You should stop using abusive sockpuppets, because that actually is illegal.) Removing your disruptive posts to WP:ANI is far from "illegal", it's highly appropriate, because a) the purpose of the noticeboard is "reporting and discussing incidents that require the intervention of administrators". A disagreement that has already been adjudicated by the ArbCom doesn't require the intervention of administrators, and obviously nobody's going to intervene in it. See how the other admins there are helping me remove your posts? Your "hate clique" is growing. And b) the page policy, stated at the top of WP:ANI, is that "any messages that egregiously violate Wikipedia's civility or personal attacks policies will be removed". Your messages certainly do violate those policies. If you put them back one more time I will block you for disruption. You are hereby banned from posting on WP:ANI and WP:AN. I don't mean just "Bgully", either, but any sock of yours. Your post are easy to recognize. Please note also that you're not allowed to use your talkpages as attack pages, either. Stop it with your everlasting lies about User:Dbachmann "vandalizing" or I will blank and protect this page, and anywhere else where you do it. You seem to be asking for a permanent ban from the ArbCom. Bishonen | ノート 08:16, 18 March 2006 (UTC).

[edit] moved page

I have moved Requests for arbitration/Dbachmann and clique to User:Bgully/Dbachmann and clique. -- RHaworth 15:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Advice

Hey, here's some free advice: If you want to bring an Arbcom case against us, go to WP:RFAR, read the instructions there, and then submit a short summary of your complaints on that page. If the case is accepted, you will then be invited to submit evidence on a new page Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Whatever title/Evidence. You cannot create that page yourself, you have to wait for the Arbcom to open the case for you. --Lukas (T.|@) 10:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] rassistic

The word rassistic does not exist. I tried the dictionary, spellcheck for typos, and nothing found. DyslexicEditor 00:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)