Talk:Bewnans Ke

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by WikiProject England, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to articles relating to England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article associated with this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

Bewnans Ke is part of WikiProject King Arthur, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to King Arthur, the Arthurian era and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Does it say Liskeard is the place of publication in the book, on the title page or verso? (Since you ask if it is OK.) Evertype 09:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

No, but the Standard says that it can be supplied. I've put it in square brackets to clarify. Of course, all of the data for the Williams/Thomas edition has been supplied and is not from the cited item because it hasn't been published yet, so I guess the whole lot should be in square brackets. Branvras
You're right about putting Liskeard in brackets. You're not right about the Exeter edition, because it is [In press.]. Evertype 17:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Not sure its correct to descibe this as an English play - To avoid RV wars what do other users think? Perhaps we should have a "Cornish language" sub cat of English plays? My thinking about the original removal of the cat was because of the language of the play IE not in English, I will leave it up to you ...........Reedgunner 08:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

"English plays" is the category not for English language plays, but plays from England (it doesn't include Scottish plays, American plays and Australian). Removing it from the cat means that it doesn't show up in any play category; perhaps it could just be put in "British plays", but I don't think a Cornish (or Cornish language) subcat is needed, there just won't be much in it.--CĂșchullain t/c 23:26, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
At this point I think there would be 2 Cornish language plays in the Cornish language play sub cat so point taken! - British plays might be a better home perhaps Reedgunner 08:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)