Talk:Betrayed Demo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

It was pointed out to me that Betrayed is not an EP but rather a demo, however I do not know how to change the article name to either 'Betrayed (Demo)', or 'Betrayed Demo'? can someone else tell me how or do it themselves (Note: all the links from the Reuben and related articles will need editing once this has been done) Chipstick 19:13, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I've renamed the article. Someone else can rename the links in the reuben templates / discog section. It's not necessary though as the "old" page redirects here. Ricmelia 14:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requested Move

Suggest that this article is moved to "Reuben demos" after all 4 demo articles are merged. Ricmelia 10:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

I can live with that - but this is not enough on its own for an article - if no merge then delete. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...)

i dont think it should be deleted. there is a lot of new infomation there that not many fans know about. Wordsfromreuben 14:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

It's hardly notable is it - and the same applies to the proliferation of similar Reuben stubs - tidy them up or hack 'em down! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 22:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

The information should certainly not be lost. I'm not happy with a merge of all four demos, but much better that then to delete the information! Chipstick 20:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

No, I don't believe it should be merged, as they are seperate releases and should be treated as seperate. Stuxmusic 16:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Betrayed cover.jpg

Image:Betrayed cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Added rationale Ric Melia 10:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)