Talk:Bernard of Septimania

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Doubtless the "clean-up" notice was applied by someone who wanted to see finished articles at all the redlinks, but didn't have the inclination to work on them. --Wetman 01:15, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Seeing what the article was like when I edited it in January (even after I'd amended some of the worst bits), I suspect it was more a matter of the execrable English of the original article. But it's now so improved that I quite concur with the removal of the clean-up tag. PWilkinson 22:09, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup

What's wrong:

  • unfinished links (like Guillem of Toulouse|Guillem) and missing links
  • inconsistencies of grammar, orthography, language, and linking
  • a general disorderliness which makes the article sloppy and hard to read
  • format of the headings and the opening section
  • redundancy

Srnec 17:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

I cleaned up a little of the inconsistent words a week or so ago. There really wasn't much wrong with it when I saw it. JR Finley Firstly let me say that this is basically very very good stuff, unfortunately the English is a bit foggy. In the spirit of helpfulness let me say this:

831 Revolt 2d paragraph 3d sentance "even it was murdered" at the begining of the parenthetical statement I guess that this is an excuse for some of the action, the murder of their sister, however there is a better way of saying it.

There was much more wrong with it and the tag should not have been removed, but I believe I have fixed it up nicely. If not, please improve it. Srnec 19:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)