Talk:Bernard Wasserstein

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

	Chicago Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by WikiProject Chicago because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove |auto=yes from the WikiProject Chicago banner above. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the |class= parameter in the WikiProject Chicago banner above and removing the stub template from the article.

Why did Maximus Rex HTML comment out my To Do: list? I've seen these (and been doing them) on wiki before?--Vsb 22:31, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

Commentary belongs on the Talk page, not in the article. (Maximus is nice -- I would have deleted it.) RickK 22:34, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

But then why do we have the Stub bit? I mean a short todo just give users a quick glance at what is needed without having to cruise through endless talk pages. I can see the importance of talking about additions and to-dos if the article is controversial but in this case I dont see the harm.--Vsb 22:44, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

All Wikipedia articles are works in progress. If we kept "to do" lists all over the place, it would be unreadable. RickK 22:46, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

Alright. Point-taken.

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)