Talk:Bernard Barker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Currently ...?

what happened in his life after this? Kingturtle 04:57, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

I second this question - any idea on where he is currently? Or maybe what he is currently doing (if not retired or passed on)? He is currently listed as people possibly alive; does anyone have any information to update this page?

[edit] Barker was a paid CIA agent at the time of the break-in.

"Barker was a paid CIA agent at the time of the break-in." He had previously been on the CIA payroll. But the assertion that he was on it at the time of the break-in is to my understanding, a theory, not an established fact. Unless a reference can be furnished I believe that I will delete this sentence.

As well, though he was on the CIA payroll and participated in various CIA operations including the Bay of Pigs invasion, I do not believe that he was ever a "CIA agent" per se.

Editdroid 14:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Need more references and citations

This article is fantastic. I think it is very clearly written. I think a few cites would nicely tighten it up. I will try to get around to adding some, but in the meantime, I have tagged it with refimprove and Citations missing. Ukulele 20:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Fantastic? Gee, I think this article should be erased and begun again. It has many inaccuracies and mistakes and is wrongly focused. I'd contribute but there is so much that is wrong with it that I don't know where to begin. If work slows down a bit I promise to give it a try. Editdroid 02:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)