User talk:Benv-b92

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gina 150x180.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gina 150x180.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Adam (Torchwood). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Edokter • Talk • 01:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated copyright violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — Edokter • Talk • 02:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "All violations edited to an extent they were no longer a copyright violation."

Decline reason: "Maybe, but you're not quite getting this. They were not written in an encylopedic style. It's a short block; sit it out and then come back and show us you've learned something. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

{{helpme|Why are the Skins episode pages being deleted when there part of WikiProject British TV shows?}}

You might want to read the discussion on episode pages in Wikipedia. Algebraist 16:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to List of Skins episodes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Party!Talk to me! 23:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I reverted the edit, and have done it again, as it was a copyright violation.

[edit] Recent edit

You undid my recent edit for being less informative, but how is calling someone openly gay (quite an offensive thing, since it makes homosexuality sound negative. 172.203.176.142 (talk) 00:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

it is less informative, as closet homosexuality is a common plot device on such TV shows, so stating that the character is openly gay is more informative.

The recent edit you made to List of Skins characters constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC))

It is not vandalism, that information should go in the list of skins episodes, not the character bio's, however what you are doing is vandalism and will now be reported.

[edit] Skins Protection

Yeah, some of the IP's do make some useful contributions, but we are getting a lot of vandalism, Copy-Vio and other annoyances..

I've done Mitch Hewer and List of Skins episodes, but if there are any others you think could benefit for a bit, just let me know

—Reedy Boy 18:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Skins Characters on main page

Hi . I just wanted to comment about the ongoing debate about the appearance of the Former Notable Characters section on the front of the Skins page. About a month and a half ago (approximately), I saw the page and the character section was seperated into three parts "Main Characters" "Supporting Characters" and "Parents". (Was that you who did that?) I assumed that the inclusion of the "Parents" as a sub-group was meant to be significant in some way perhaps because they were the "Antagonists" of the main characters or were they there because of the actors' notoriety. It was also odd as there already is a seperate page with a lot of the characters with character descriptions attached. I think what really happened lately was at the end of last week's episode where Mark Jenkins died, a user had added "former character" beside the actor's name along with 3 other actors in the Parents section, who may or may not be coming back. Soon, a mod saw this and created that subdivision "Former Characters", but under that category they also put Cassie's parents underneath it, when it hasn't been confirmed if they are not returning. and why is it all the parents, what about other characters? What about Angie? Is she returning? We are only at Episode 4 of a 10 episode series. I would suggest leaving the Character list as it is on the front page, but then place the characters by series (Current and Former) in the expanded page linked above the characters section). I think that the parents subdivision has a certain place within the page, otherwise other notable faces would have been added. The section is titled "Parents, not Other characters" like the expanded page. I have spoke to Mikay, the mod who made the decision to add the Subdivision "Former Characters" and he agreed with my suggestions. (Check his user page)We are trying to figure out what the best course of action is to fix this situation. I appreciate your work on Wikipedia . Thanks again 69.28.232.214 (talk) 01:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC) samusek2

[edit] Skins episodes

Having episode pages has never bothered me...just you re-created one after they had already gone thtough a discussion. Unless you want to have them deleted by people who go around looking for pages to delete..then you should make shure they follow Wikipedia:EPISODE, or create series pages. Russell [ Talk ] 20:23, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gavin & Stacey

Hello. Whilst the recent changes to Gavin & Stacey are trivial (not done by me) they dont constitute vandalism hence the update block you have applied is inappropriate. More worryingly, in reverting those changes you have reinstated the plot spoilers. Please revert the page to the version 21.09 on 19March08. Thanks.Pwimageglow (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)