User talk:Benski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Benski, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Contents |
[edit] Regarding Cornerstone Research
There are, unfortunately, many articles on companies in the Wikipedia that are against the relevant inclusion guideline for companies. The rule of thumb I use is that the company must have been the subject of at least one article or show in the media, and companies that fail this rule are almost always not going to meet WP:COMPANY. If you can list the competitors for CR that have articles here, maybe we can get the larger audience of WP:AFD to take a look at them. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 23:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, Kaustuv! I appreciate the message. I was not aware of these guidelines (I was trying to adhere, however loosely, to a common sense approach) but will certainly heed them in the future, and will read through each of the pages you suggested. I will do my best to add to the Cornerstone page -- particularly sources -- over the next several days. In answer to your question, the companies I was thinking of were Analysis Group, LECG, and NERA.Benski 23:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
One thing you might want to be wary of is the presence of so-called peacock terms. For example, in the lede you say that "Cornerstone Research is a leading ...". You should either find independent studies to substantiate that CR is indeed a leading somethingorother, or leave out such terms entirely. I also recommend using the standard {{Infobox Company}} template instead of inlining data such as the number of employees; see LECG for an example of its use. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 12:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Reading to Kids logo.JPG
Hello, Benski. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Reading to Kids logo.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Benski/Sandbox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:R2K logo.PNG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:R2K logo.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP:WLA
This user wants you to join WikiProject Los Angeles. |
(♠Taifarious1♠) 02:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Uclaanderson logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Uclaanderson logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)