User talk:Bendono/Archives/2008/April

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

1 Phonological Contrast Of wu
2 q And qw
3 April 2008
4 History of Japan

Phonological Contrast Of wu

Was there any point in time, phonological contrast of wu?68.148.164.166 (talk) 01:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

See the question above this. Bendono (talk) 08:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Opps, sorry, I probably meant ye.68.148.164.166 (talk) 07:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Contrast between /e/ and /ye/? Most definitely yes. Review Old Japanese and Late Old Japanese. As the latter indicates, the contrast vanished by the 10th century around the time that kana came into being. So while it was never distinguished in kana, it was distinguished in Man'yōgana. See also Jōdai Tokushu Kanazukai. Also notice that the phonemes /e/ and /ye/ merged into /e/, but the pronunciation of /e/ was [je] for many centuries. Bendono (talk) 08:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

O, so kana were invented after the phonemes merged?68.148.164.166 (talk) 04:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I just wrote that above. Bendono (talk) 04:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

q And qw

Isn't possible other comic books use it for q and qw?Asrghasrhiojadrhr (talk) 05:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Just like last month, please read the notice at the top of my page. More specifically, please do not fracture conversations by having them in multiple locations. Bendono (talk) 05:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Talk:Kenkai in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Beeblbrox (talk) 08:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

The comment was in English. The reference was not. I've been here for years, so there is no need for the generic message. While I disagree, I will not argue it so I removed my comment. Delete the page for all I care. Just trying to help. Bendono (talk) 08:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Maybe it's none of my bussiness, but anyway. It was not a comment in the non-English language but a direct quote from a source relevant to the discussion, and I can't see why that could cause a problem. Of course, a translation would be a must. But that was forthcoming? I could have provided one or maybe Bendono could have done.

I wanted to thank Bendono for cluing me. But now the comment is gone, I'm kinda lost :) -- Taku (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

I didn't mean to get everyone all agitated like this, my point was simply what the template says, that on the English language WP, we use English, and if you have information to add that's not in English, it needs to be translated or it can't be used here. In any event, it would still be in the page history if anyone would care to translate it so we can figure out if it does or does not address the verifiability issues with the article. I apologize if I offended anyone, I didn't mean to imply that contributions were not welcome, just that for the sake of coherent conversation where all parties can participate, we should use English. Thanks Beeblbrox (talk) 22:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)