Talk:Benrath line
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I made redirects for the following two red links of this article:
- Saxony for the link Upper Saxon and
- East Low German for the link East Low Saxon.
I wonder if you agree or have any better ideas. -- Adam78 01:26, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- I don't like the kind of redirect Thuringian-->Thuringia because it makes you think that a page on Thuringian exists while it really doesn't. If the link remains red, then you can see at last that the page doesn't exist. (Fortunately, a page on Upper Saxon already exists, and I've fixed the redirect.) -- j. 'mach' wust | ✑ 13:33, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
-
- The link Thuringian suffers exactly from the same problem as the link Thuringian. Actually, they look identical and they link to the same page. Incidently, I'd prefer Thuringian. -- j. 'mach' wust | ✑ 13:43, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Recent movement of the line
I would remove the last phrase of the article regarding a recent northward movement of the line. So far, no one could name a source for it. More or less it seems to be someone’s assumption witout a proof. Please see also the Talk:High German consonant shift.--Zarbi1 13:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)