Talk:Ben Macdui

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.
United Kingdom Portal
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments)
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance within the UK geography WikiProject.
WikiProject Mountains
 This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information)
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
High This article has been rated as High-importance to WikiProject Mountains on the project's importance scale.
If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments.
This article is supported by WikiProject British and Irish hills, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Oh aye, since when? ;-) Grinner 11:11, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)

Why did someone just chop out most of this article?

Hard to tell, but in the absence of any justification for it, we'll undo it. --Stemonitis 08:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed move

I propose to move this article to Ben Macdui (currently a redirect to Ben Macdhui with no page history, so no admin assistance is required). The spelling and capitalisation is consistent with the OS 1:25,000 map (it's in all caps on the 1:50,000) and Butterfield's High Mountains of Britain and Ireland, the two most reliable sources I can lay my hands on; confirmation from other sources (e.g. Munro's Tables) would be welcome. I don't know how the South African mountain is usually spelt, but I don't think I've ever seen the Scottish one spelt with an H in modern sources. And I may be accused of cultural chauvinism, but I feel fairly sure that the Scottish Ben Macd(h)ui is the primary meaning of the name, and so doesn't need a disambiguator; a hatnote would suffice.

Any comments/words of support/objections? --Blisco 19:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

At the risk of contravening WP:AUTO I am in complete agreement. It's 'Macdui' in the SMC District Guide and Munro's Tables. So far as I can see 'Macdhui' is a relatively uncommon pre WW2 spelling. Ben MacDui (Talk) 20:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

It looks fairly unequivocal. All the reliable sources, including all those quoted in the article used the spelling "Ben Macdui" (although the OS also gives "Beinn Macduibh" [Gaelic?], which probably ought to be mentioned). I agree that a hatnote would be sufficient to link between the two mountains. Is it therefore your intention to move Ben Macdhui (South Africa) to Ben Macdhui afterwards (the logical corollary)? I can do that, if it is. --Stemonitis 10:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Since this one can conceivably be spelt Ben Macdhui (hence the spelling of the other one), it would make more sense to keep Ben Macdhui as a disambiguation page, and keep the South African one at its current title. That way, misspelt links to the Scottish mountain (of which there will inevitably be some) will be more easily identified. --Blisco 18:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
I have just realised: Ben Macdui redirects to Ben Macdhui, not Ben Macdhui (Scotland), so admin. assistance will be required to move that there. It is only possible for a non-admin to move an article over another one if the other's history comprises a single edit, and the latter is a redirect to the former. --Stemonitis 19:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
OK, could you oblige please? I presume there's no need to go through WP:RM as we have consensus on this page. --Blisco 18:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I think the consensus among we few is clear enough. If anyone wants to move it back, they can always go through WP:RM (in the knowledge that there'll be a least a couple of votes against). Consider it done. --Stemonitis 18:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! --Blisco 20:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)