Talk:Bell 427
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was the article was moved to the current name. --Born2flie 04:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Requested merger
Bell 429 → Bell 427 — Overlappngs subject matter, one is a derivitive of the other, and minimal content on each page. - BillCJ 19:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
[edit] Discussion
Keeping all the content under Bell 427 may only be a temporary measure, as the 429 looks to be the major future production model. As such, using Bell 427 for the content would also be acceptable, as would Bell 427/429. This may well depend on how successful the 429 is. - BillCJ 19:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Decision
No contest, will merge. In addition, I will move this page to Bell 427/429, but will not oppose if it is moved back to "Bell 427" (or "Bell 429 either, just not both). - BillCJ 05:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.