Talk:Bela Lugosi's Dead

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Contents

[edit] 2 pages

There are two distinct pages for this song: The article on Bauhaus links to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bela_Lugosi%27s_Dead but there is also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bela_Lugosi's_Dead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flyingtreemonkey (talk • contribs) 15:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Marilyn Manson?

I noticed it says he did a cover, but I know nothing of that. Can someone confirm this.

I can't, but I do see he has recently referred to his new song "If I Was Your Vampire" as 'the new "Bela Lugosi's Dead"'.[1] I wonder if there's some confusion there. --David Edgar 12:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
There's no reference for it, and as that's the probably source of confusion, I'm removing it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jsherwood (talk • contribs) 02:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Lyrics?

Is it a good idea to have the lyrics posted on Wikipedia? I've never seen a song page feature lyrics before, and anyway, they are copyrighted, which goes against WP policy. Yes, many many websites get away with posting lyrics because when people post lyrics, they're only being a resource for fans of the band, but still, is that something we want to be doing here on Wikipedia?

Also, the lyrics are missing Murphy's background repitition of "Oh Bela / Bela's not dead" (or maybe "undead", I forget). I'm not going to add it for the above reason, though. Folkor 02:13, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

WP:L&P says "Modern songwriters and poets have not released their works under an open content licence and therefore their inclusion in Wikipedia violates their copyright." - so you're right, the lyrics should not be included. (Though Fair Use allows parts to be quoted.) I removed them and added an external link to them on another page. --David Edgar 08:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks. I'd've done it myself, but I wasn't entirely sure if I was in the right. Folkor 18:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
I think an excerpt from the lyrics would be both fair use and appropriate. Delete 'em if the consensus is otherwise. Nareek 03:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bela Lugosi's Dead Cover.jpg

Image:Bela Lugosi's Dead Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Movie Still

The movie still used on the cover is from "The Sorrows of Satan" US (1926). Directed by D.W. Griffith, it depicts Prince Lucio revealing his true idenity (Satan) to the hero. The film doesn't have Bela Lugosi in it. 203.171.199.3 (talk) 06:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC) Matthew BG

[edit] citation needed?

Why should a citation be needed for an observation that a song is evocative of others? Would the fact that other people have also made this observation (or not) make it any more (or less) valid? MattCoon (talk) 12:39, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The fact that it has been published is a requirement of Wikipedia. The individual observations of editors is not permitted. If the baseline referencing the Gary Glitter song is a widely held critical opinion, then it will have been discussed in multiple music publications and should be easy to find. Even better would be David J. Haskins or the other band members quoted as saying something like "yeah, we were listing to a lot of Gary Glitter then..." Y'know? --Knulclunk (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)