User talk:Beanssnaeb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Silent Hill

I really wish you would have brought another GA nom up on the talk page before going ahead and doing it. I think that the Plot section is still too long, and if it fails now, we'll have to wait some time before re-submitting. --InShaneee 22:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Probably should have, I apologize. Please, next time, post if you think the plot is too long or have any other concerns. The CGI got handled quickly -- but maybe I was too quick on the draw. If so, I do apologize. If it fails, we should have plenty of time to improve then before resubmitting. --Beanssnaeb 22:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Driver

To give you a heads up, I responded to your comment on the talk page for Driver, since I don't know if you watch the article. Feel free to contest my points. --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 23:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Children of Men

Hi, this is just a polite message to inform you that I merged your DVD release addition into a general release section. If this is a problem, let me know. —Viriditas | Talk 04:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem at all. --Beanssnaeb 05:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
I neglected to commend you on your composition skills. You're a good writer, and we could use more of your expertise. User:Yllosubmarine has requested a cast section, and there's a temporary page setup at Talk:Children of Men/Temp if you have any ideas. I hope to see more of your work in the article. —Viriditas | Talk 06:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The cast section looks good. It would look great right below the plot section. Please add it. The temp page is just a sandbox; You don't need anyone's approval. And if you don't think the release section headings work the way I messed with them, please fix them to suit your taste. —Viriditas | Talk 21:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Remember to remove the cast info from the production section after you add the cast section. —Viriditas | Talk 21:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Nice work. If you have any interest working on the lead section, I'm going to add some material that a bunch of editors have worked on (including myself) to the temp page. It needs sources, and verification. Some of it may even seem like original research, but that's ok, because we will identify it as such and replace it on the temp page. You are welcome to invite other editors to work on it, too. —Viriditas | Talk 03:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Post it here and I see if I can contribute. Basically, I'm keeping most of my eye on the talk and main page and doing additions and such from there. --Beanssnaeb 03:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
No worries. I'll link to it from the talk page. The reason we use temp pages is to avoid edit wars on the main page. —Viriditas | Talk 03:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey, if you get a chance, can you address Maria's (Yllosubmarine) question about the cast section on the main talk page? I have to log out. —Viriditas | Talk 15:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I posted my statements on the Discussion Page for CoM. Sorry I wasn't able to post them last night (electrical outtage in my area).Arcayne 19:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I thought I'd let you know that i appreciate you stepping in to calm the waters a bit. Viriditas is one of those types who makes me simply shake my head in dismay.
I thought I would point out that in the melded statement, you lumped the thematic components together with the pacing elements of the cinematography. The use of the extended shots creates not just a realism but an immediacy to events. That would seem to be a production choice as opposed to a thematic decision. I think that the melded statement addesses the production/cinematography appropriately, but I feel something more is perhaps needed to communicate the non-cinematography choices (ie, editing in the laughter of children and the words shantih shantih shantih at the end). I feel that there is a difference, and lumping them together confuses rather than summarizes the elements.Arcayne 18:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
No problem, sometimes we all don't see eye to eye, it happens. I've been adding to the temp page, hopefully to address your concerns so keep an eye on it. --Beanssnaeb 18:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dvd SH Church.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dvd SH Church.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Silent hill.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Silent hill.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 14:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:GansonSet.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:GansonSet.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 22:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Newshart.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Newshart.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dvd SH Janitor.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dvd SH Janitor.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)