Talk:Beaumont children disappearance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Flag
Portal
 Beaumont children disappearance is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime.
Assessment comments

Contents

[edit] Move to a new name?

I propose we move this article to Beaumont children disappearance to bring the article title more in line with the remainder of the Australian crime articles covering disappearances, such as the Azaria Chamberlain disappearance, and the Peter Falconio disappearance. -- Longhair | Talk 13:22, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Fine by me. Ambi 14:12, 1 May 2005 (UTC)`
I'm not opposed.--Cyberjunkie 05:03, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
Done -- Longhair | Talk 06:06, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Biography

Should that Biography WikiProject banner really be there?  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!)

[edit] Other cases and a possible solution?

The section titled "Other cases and a possible solution" is deceiving and should be cleaned up in general. There is no "possible solution" presented, although it may be inferred due to the mention of other children who had been murdered. If there is a definitive "possible solution" to explore, it should be explained. GCD1 20:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

You're right. Have changed it to "other cases" which I think could be improved upon, but I can't think of a better header at the moment. Rossrs 20:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
"Other Possible Related Cases" maybe? Just a suggestion...Engr105th (talk) 10:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bevan Spencer von Einem

When describing the claims of the witness (presumably Mr. B, though the article fails to name him), the article relates his claims regarding what von Einem said as fact, rather than hearsay. For example, "Von Einem also told the witness that he had taken two girls from the Adelaide Oval during a football match." Since this is not proven fact, shouldn't it read "Von Einem also allegedly told the witness that he had taken two girls from the Adelaide Oval during a football match"? Evil bacteria (talk) 22:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)