Talk:Beaumont House

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Beaumont House has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on January 13, 2007.
November 30, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
Architecture Portal
This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the assessment scale.
Flag
Portal
 Beaumont House is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide.
Assessment comments

[edit] Images

Beneaththelandslide (talk · contribs) (aka Michael) said he'd get some pictures of the house in the next couple of days. Currently, the first owner will do :) Cheers, Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 03:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

And there we go. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 06:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Minor Improvements

  • Should it be "the House" or "the house"? I think it only needs the capitals when being called "Beaumont House".
  • It could do with a better caption in the infobox, eg something commenting on the architecture or the additions to the front of the house.
maelgwn - talk 02:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestions!
  • I fixed the two capital versions for consistency - you're probably right.
  • It's the rear façade so I named it as such.
Cheers, and thanks again, Daniel 03:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA

After some minor twekaing that I just did myself, I think this article is GA quality. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)