Talk:Beatle Barkers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Start
This article has
been rated as
Start-Class
on the
assessment scale.
  This Beatles-related article is within the scope of The Beatles WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of The Beatles, Apple Records, George Martin, Brian Epstein/NEMS, and related topics. You are more than welcome to join the project and/or contribute to discussion.

Low
This article has
been rated as
Low importance on the
importance scale.

Article Grading:
The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit ยท refresh)


  • Considered outside scope and AFDable... I feel we as a Project don't have to take 'ownership' of this one. It's not a Beatles article, it's an article about an 'amusing' covers album. I've tagged it with {{importance}}; save for a badly worded IP edit saying it was played at parties in "rural Florida" and once got played on a student radio station, there's no assertion of notability. 0 incoming links from mainspace. Probably shouldn't be in category and I think it's a strong AFD candidate too (but I haven't Googled for it yet; waiting for others' comments first). -- Steve (6 March 2006)
  • Update 22 Mar 06, result of AfD was keep. Suppose we have to take it under our wing? If so, what to do? It's a start class article at best. ++Lar: t/c 17:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • We might need a new category to put the Beatles-related stuff into (see discussion below at Beatlemania (musical)). For now, just regrade it as stub or start class or I guess. --kingboyk 18:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 10 March 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

[edit] Importance

Google: [1] doesn't seem to turn up much notability. Amazon doesn't have it, and they have a lot of obscure stuff... Neither of those are definitive but I'd say give it a week or two, maybe contact some of the folk on this list to ask for info, if nothing pops up, AfD it... that usually gets people to improve articles if they're improvable. Agree it does not belong in the main Beatles category. ++Lar: t/c 05:15, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

I'll start by leaving a message for the article creator, Longhair. --kingboyk 16:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Replied on your talk page. -- Longhair 17:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't agree with the removal of the importance tag. It's an album by dogs not by The Beatles :-) I'm sure it's fun - I'd like a copy myself - but is it notable? --kingboyk 17:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't have any sales information handy, and I'm looking about to see what else this group released. All Music Guide has a listing, though it's rather blank on information :( . I'm not too fussed about the removal from the Beatles category. It's not Beatles material afterall. -- Longhair 17:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
If it stays, we can look at moving it into a subcategory. It doesn't belong in the parent category, subcat is fine. --kingboyk 17:46, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Barkersbarkers.jpg

Image:Barkersbarkers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)