Talk:Bayreuth Circle/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Rating by Richard Wagner Project

Start class (low end), falling under the Quality Scale definition "moderately useful but still obviously far from definitive" . Assessment is not the place to question the content of the article, however it is controversial and for that reason needs to be meticulously referenced. Also the article is not well structured or particularly easy for a non-specialist to read. --Kleinzach 05:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Start class (low end), indeed. It is actually difficult to avoid commenting on the content, which is thin. Reads like an essay rather than an encyclopedia article, contains phrases such as "a name applied by some writers", "has been associated by some writers", "supposed Bayreuth Circle" (rather as if it's arguing for the speedy deletion of the article). It doesn't help that one of the three specifically cited references is a student essay, either. If it really is a viable article, it needs to be completely rewritten. The AfD discussion is a depressing read, too. --GuillaumeTell 21:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC)