Talk:Battlefield Baseball

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
Battlefield Baseball is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of baseball and baseball-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.


This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Did You Know An entry from Battlefield Baseball appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on May 18, 2006.
Wikipedia
Battlefield Baseball was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Reviewed version: August 10, 2006

[edit] Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 14, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: OK, but needs some grammar and spellcheck work, as well as exansion.
2. Factually accurate?: OK, but needs more references for the information that is missing (see below)
3. Broad in coverage?: This article is not thorough. It should include promotion of the film, production costs and methods, how much the film made, any DVD release info, soundtrack info, a cast and crew listing and any anecdotes of note about the film. For a good example, see King Kong (2005 film)
4. Neutral point of view?: I can see than an effort was made to show point of view, but I added "citation needed" tags to two paragraphs that claim that critics or viewers felt a certain way about the movie, but then doesn't mention or reference proof of this.
5. Article stability? Stable, but actually needs more work.
6. Images?: Only one, but that is good enough, since most pics associated with movies are going to be copyrighted. You might be able to find an ad, but if not, that's ok.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far. --Esprit15d 14:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)