Talk:Battle of Southern Buh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Bulgaria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Bulgaria-related topics. Please visit the project page if you would like to participate. Happy editing! | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. | |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
 |
To-do list for Battle of Southern Buh: | edit · history · watch · refresh |
|---|---|---|
|
No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category |
||
 |
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. | ||||||||||||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
[edit] Neutrality
In this article I can see statemenets such as
- "... and they turned to their old method for such situations: they bribed the Magyars to attack Bulgaria from the northeast."
which present a pretty strange view of history. Hiring various other nations and tribes to do your dirty work was common. Everyone did this back then. But enough about this example. Maybe this article suffers more from un-encyclopaedic writing than problems in neutrality. Jeltz talk 20:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Then it would be nice if you rewrite it in encyclopaedic style; the information presented is true, so you could do that.
"... and they turned to their old method for such situations: they bribed the Magyars to attack Bulgaria from the northeast." It is written nowhere that this method was evil or tricky: it is normal for every country with smart rulers do take such opportunity if possible, and the Byzantines acted that way many times. --Gligan 10:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
