Talk:Battle of Ratan and Sävar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.


This battle wasn't a total Russian victory when the second day's battle is taken into consideration (and let me say that, contrary to statements in this article, the two battles are generally not taken as one decisive encounter; if it were it would be a decisive Russian victory because the Swedish army was the one that withdrew), but it definately wasn't a "marginal Swedish victory". This unequivocal bias is so typical of this website. My opinion is that if you take part in it, you immediately label yourself an idiot and completely uneducated.

"http://www.napoleon-series.org/military/battles/c_finnish.html"


Yes, this is true, the article has been updated. The resulting outcome from both battles can be seen as a marginal victory for the Swedes as it clearly improved the positions in the negotiation. However, the swedish army was retreating and thus was the losers of the battle (tactically), but since the Russians were also retreating north after having suffered heavy casualties in the fighting, the outcome was not really a clear Russian victory either.

What could be said is that the Russians had a marginal pyrrhic victory, but due to this the strategical gain was for the Swedes, though not as much that had been hoped for initially.

So, in effect, and as was written in the article as well, the battle of Savar was clearly a Russian victory, but the subsequent engagements at Ratan was clearly a Swedish tactical victory (i.e. the Russians were repelled and the Swedish army could board the ships). Not unlike the British-Franco victorious defeat of Dunkirk (though in a lot smaller scale).

The noting of marginal Swedish victory was summing the two battles together, and was with respect to the total strategical outcome, not the tactical outcome.

This is confusing, so it now say marginal russian victory and clarifies the strategical situation afterwards in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.57.75 (talk) 15:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] recent edits and casualties

There is a book called "svedish battles" ISBN: 9146210873, it quotes the casualties at Ratan for the Russians as 150, and the Sävar casulties as 1600 (600 dead, 1000 wounded).

The Internet link quoting 3200 casualties on the Russian side is not reliable.

It is discussable and probably a good idea to have the both battles outcomes listed separately. I.e. Sävar: Russian victory, Ratan: Swedish victory, instead of only having the total outcome as a marginal Swedish victory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.57.75 (talk) 23:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)