Talk:Battle of Ramla

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Associated task forces (periods and conflicts): Medieval warfare task force (c. 500–c. 1500) Crusades task force

	Middle Ages Portal Battle of Ramla is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
	Crusades task force
WikiProject Middle Ages To do:

[edit] Battles of Ramla/Ramleh

September 7, 1101 may or may not be the date of the first battle of Ramla or Ramleh. It may not be correct as an indicated death date for Stephen of Blois, however.

It certainly conflicts with the date of death indicated in Stephen II, Count of Blois (an article linked to by this one).

The first battle is typically indicated as a victory. Although the actual numbers may have been embellished, there are accounts of how, even though severely outnumbered, Baldwin and his small group carried the day.

The second battle is generally indicated to have been a disaster. Baldwin was fortunate to have escaped with his life. Few others did. Stephen of Blois, is indicated as having died in this second battle. There is more to be found on the net by searching "Battle of Ramleh" and "Ramleh" .

I have seen dates of death for Stephen (and or the second battle) given as sometime in 1102, as May 17, May 19, 27 May, and as 13 Jul 1102. I haven't found anyone offering 1101, however, or indicating that he died in the first battle of Ramla.

I think that when possible, conflicts between Wikipedia articles that are linked should be resolved. If they can't be resolved then an explanation that cites references should be offered.

In addition, I have an issue with the fourth paragraph. The one that begins with "The second battle..." There is actually more in this paragraph regarding Jaffa and subsequent conflict there, than on the second battle of Ramla. The second battle of Ramla seems to be the subject of that particular paragraph and Ramla (not Jaffa, or even Baldwin) certainly is the subject of the article.

The Jaffa mention at least deserves another paragraph, and may be best presented as another article.

--Dogfish 00:16, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

You're right, the deaths of Stephen of Blois and Hugh of Vermandois (which you noted a couple of days ago) are pretty confused. I think I was responsible for writing these so I am probably to blame; maybe the original sources are confused though, since they are kind of sparse after 1099. I'll check again when I can, but if you can solve these problems, you are welcome to do so. Adam Bishop 01:32, 11 June 2006 (UTC)