Talk:Battle of Osgiliath

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Middle-earth Wikiproject This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Needs work. Rewrite the page, I just gave you guys stuff to work with.- B-101 14:46, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

That fool Nanoboy has been at it again: He put Faramir's strength at 2,1000 and his loses at 700-800. WHERE ARE YOU GETTING THESE NUMBERS? WHERE? I think he's just making them up. ***Faramir had about 500 men, the book says this. It doesn't mention how many exactly were lost. Plus, in the first chapter of ROTK they give a detailed account of how many men reinforced Minas Tirith, which combined with their own garrison was under 5,000. I don't think 2,100 were in the field. But the point is, where did you get "2,100", Your imagination? A video game? Cards? WTF mate. Further, he goes on to say that there were "21,000 to 28,000" Morgul Host plus Haradrim. Where are you getting this? There were ~200,000 Orcs and 18,000 Haradrim (the book says 3X6,000 = 18,000). And he listed Mordor losses at 2,200 to 2,700--->based on WHAT? What are you basing this on? Numbers that look pretty to you? ----Ricimer


Actually, I have now read your previous "forces" thing from old edit: it's baseless. I can't find this refferences to "Faramir losing a third of his men" in the book, or anything stating how many men he took. Can you cite page number, etc? I did find the reference that Faramir's men killed 10 times there number, but it was just a drop in the buckt for a 200,000+ army. ---Ricimer


Actually, Faramir says before the battle that even if they made the enemy pay 10 times as much, they would still rue the crossing of the enemy. It doesn't reference the actual orc casualty count. In the chapter "The Siege of Gondor", it says that Faramir had lost 1/3 of his men in the retreat from Osgiliath. I did some work on the movie adaptation. - Shanath18

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Orcs crossing anduin.jpg

Image:Orcs crossing anduin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Retakeosgiliath.jpg

Image:Retakeosgiliath.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Rangersosgiliath.jpg

Image:Rangersosgiliath.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)