Talk:Battle of Liège

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Liège article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces (periods and conflicts):
	World War I task force

[edit] No Casualties

I've found no web site that lists casualties on either side in this important opening battle of the Great War. Not even Barbara Tuchman's Pulitzer-winning "The Guns of August" contains that material. Most peculiar.

BT 11-06

All right, I'm done for now, I'll finish the article later. It's going to be rather long... ^_^ ugen64 18:07, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)

Don't worry, I'll get to it... eventually...

At least tell me who won the battle!--Milicz 00:15, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why is this "not global"?

Any idea why this was tagged as "not having a global perspective"? From my own perspective it seems fine... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.102.147.50 (talk) 16:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Agree with previous comment; the tag doesn't seem relevant - I've removed it; it can of course go back, if we've both missed something here. Scoop100 (talk) 21:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)