Talk:Battle of Lechaeum/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

   1. Well written?: Good mechanics. No errors in spelling/grammar. Smooth transition between paragraphs and sentences.
   2. Factually accurate?: The article is factually accurate based on the references shown.
   3. Broad in coverage?: Though the article is short, thoroughness of content is evident.
   4. Neutral point of view?: The biases expressed in the sources are all expressed in the article.
   5. Article stability?: Stability evident.
   6. Images?: The article contains images that neatly visualize the events that transpired in the Battle of Lechaeum.

The Battle of Lechaeum is a well-written and well-sourced article. Though the article is somewhat short, it is still very good in the content is portrays. Deucalionite 15:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)