Talk:Battle of Heartbreak Ridge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (nations and regions): Korean military history task force United States military history task force

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea (Military History), a project to build and improve articles related to Korea. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
	Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please help us improve this article.
	???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] npov

It seems like much of this article is not NPOV, and sounds a lot like a story and not so much an encyclopedia article. If I'm right, much of what's on the page would need to be chopped up and rewritten much more concisely. I can't, however, do this without coming to some sort of consensus with others on the problem areas. I don't want to edit what I consider to be very interesting and good without at least being given the OK by someone who agrees that the language used is very much like a narrative. (Mythos721 17:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC))