Talk:Battle Games in Middle-earth (magazine)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles. Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.
Assessment Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article states that this magazine includes "Exclusive miniatures are much sought after in countries where the magazine is not sold, and include Hama, Theodred and a much sought after conversion kit." I for one would like someone with the knowledge to include a more comprehensive list of what these exlusive items actually were. - Waza 02:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Acclaim section

"The magazine has been extremely popular, mostly due to it outdoing the basic and unreliable White Dwarf terrain and painting articles with detailed and dependable "masterclass" guides. The first few packs were simple for beginners, but current packs outdo even WD's Warhammer articles, dispelling the myth that Lord of the Rings SBG is intended as a beginners' game."

This is definately not a neutral point of view, and sounds like opinion. Where did this acclaim come from? If there's no outside source it should probably be rewritten. --Xzamuel 17:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] External links broken

With the removal of the GW forums, the links for "GW Official Forum information regarding the list of issues, by Steve Hammatt" and "GW Official Forum information regarding rules differences, by Alessio Cavatore" are broken. Darkson 22:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC) Darkson

Then they should be removed. The other links provide mostly the same information as the first said link already, but the rules differences will probably not be easily found elsewhere. --Grimhelm 22:31, 30 December 2006 (UTC)