Battle of Épehy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Battle of Épehy
Part of The Hundred Days Offensive, World War I
Date 18 September 1918
Location Épehy, France
Result British victory
Belligerents
United Kingdom
Australia
France
Germany
Commanders
Henry Rawlinson
Julian Byng
Marie-Eugene Debeney
Unknown
Strength
12 divisions Unknown
Casualties and losses
Total: unknown
Australian: 1,260 men (265 Killed, 1059 Wounded)[1]
Total: unknown
Captured: 11,750 men

The Battle of Épehy was a World War I battle fought on 18 September 1918, involving the British Fourth Army (under the command of General Henry Rawlinson) against German outpost positions in front of the Hindenburg Line.

Contents

[edit] Prelude

Field Marshal Douglas Haig was not eager to carry out any offensives until the assault on the Hindenburg Line itself, influenced by mounting British losses from previous battles that year - over 600,000 casualties since March, 180,000 of those in the past six weeks. Rawlinson was kept reined in and advised by Haig to ensure his men were well rested for the eventual attack on the Line; however, when news arrived of the British Third Army's victory at the Battle of Havrincourt, Haig's mind was changed. On the day following the success at Havrincourt, 13 September, Haig approved Rawlinson's plan to clear German outpost positions on the high ground before the Hindenburg Line, and preparations began.

[edit] The battle

Very few tanks could be provided for the attack, so artillery would have to be relied upon to prepare the way, but in the interests of surprise they would not be able to provide a preliminary bombardment. The 1,488 guns would instead fire concentration shots at the operation's zero hour and support the infantry with a creeping barrage. 300 machine guns were also made available. All three corps of the Fourth Army were to take part, with V Corps of the Third Army on their left flank and on their right the French First Army (under Marie Debeny). The objective consisted of a fortified zone roughly 3 miles deep and 20 miles long, supported by subsidiary trenches and strongpoints. The German Second and Eighteenth Armies were defending the area.

On 18 September at 5.20am the attack opened and the troops advanced. The promised French assistance did not arrive, resulting in limited success for IX Corps on that flank. On the left flank, III Corps also found difficulty when attacking the villages of Épehy and Peizière, held determinedly by German troops. The story was a different one in the centre of the advance, however, where General John Monash's two Australian divisions achieved complete and dramatic success. These two divisions, the 1st and 4th, had a strength of some 6,800 men[1] and in the course of the day captured 4,243 prisoners, 76 guns, 300 machine guns and 30 trench mortars. They took all their objectives and advanced to a distance of about three miles, on a four mile front. The Australian casualties were 1,260 officers and men (265 Killed, 1057 Wounded, 2 Captured)[2]. The attack closed as a Allied victory, with 9,000 prisoners and 100 guns being taken.

[edit] Aftermath

Although Épehy was not a massive success, it signalled an unmistakable message that the Germans were weakening and it encouraged the Allies to take further action with haste, before the Germans could consolidate their positions (see Meuse-Argonne Offensive). Sometime after this battle, Rawlinson reported to Haig that German officers were saying frankly that "their men no longer wanted to face Australian soldiers", a consequence of their results at Épehy[3].

[edit] References

  1. ^ A. G. Butler, page 723
  2. ^ A. G. Butler, page 723
  3. ^ L. Carlyon, page 699
Published References

[edit] Notes

  1. ^  - The British and Australian official histories both state an Australian strength of 6,800 infantry. However Major-General Sir Archibald Montgomery's The Story of the Fourth Army, written apparently with full access to the British Army's documents states different figures; 5,902 Australian infantry engaged, 1,700 prisoners taken, 87 guns captured and casualties of 1,022 men. The former figure has been used in this article, but the difference should be noted.