User talk:Basil45

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Evolution, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tim Vickers (talk) 04:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Wiggles. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Newtman (talk) 05:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Little context in Sanctus Rex

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sanctus Rex, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sanctus Rex is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sanctus Rex, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BencherliteTalk 11:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Le Wiggles.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Le Wiggles.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Note: I also question if this is in fact the logo for the French group as it is straight from the Wiggles main page---not the french version.Balloonman (talk) 08:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] le wiggles

I have nominated Le Wiggles for deletion, please feel free to join in the debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Wiggles. Balloonman (talk) 07:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


Please do not create hoaxes. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. I assume this is what is going on with Le Wiggles. Please stop, or you will end up being banned from editing. Thank you. Snalwibma (talk) 09:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

There is a discussion about you are the admin noticeboard here please come and explain your creation of multiple hoax articles there. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 06:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Komodo dragon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Alexf(Talk/Contribs) 01:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Thesearethevistas.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Thesearethevistas.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)