User talk:Bart Versieck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


  • Current status: > Awaiting posts.

Hello! Please, append your message at the end of the page.


This page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III.

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!

Goeiedag/Hello Bart Versieck, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, and happy editing.

[edit] WOP Newsletter

The World's Oldest People WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 1 • April 20, 2008 • About the Project • Written by: Editorofthewiki
News
  • Edna Parker, the oldest verified living person, turned 115 April 20
Features

Featured WOP articles of the week:

Collaboration of the Month
ArchivesNewsroom

If you would not like to recieve this newsletter, please add your name here.


Delivered by: Editorofthewiki

[edit] Roy Henderson and two similar articles

Hi. Thank you for your message but I'm a bit confused by receiving a message from 'Extremely sexy'. Are you now editing under the name Bart Versieck? I tried to find your edits under 'Extremely sexy' . . . . Which articles were you referring to? Opera singer categorization is explained here. About 1400 articles are categorized this way. Thanks. --Kleinzach 03:18, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

That's my nickname, but the subcategory (if there happens to be one that is) should always be the only one added. Extremely sexy (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Hence, those three persons (you know whom) should only be categorized over here. Extremely sexy (talk) 20:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] No content in Category:Army personnel by nationality

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Army personnel by nationality, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Army personnel by nationality has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Army personnel by nationality, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Just so you know

You can appeal the block by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. And the reason you are blocked is because of editing others' comments. Please stop doing so - I don't want to see you blocked indefinitely. Interactive Fiction Expert/Talk to me 11:53, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I will pay attention. Extremely sexy (talk) 20:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
And yet, why do you continue? I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 20:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
I honestly even don't remember at all editing talkpages the last time, and I'm surprised to be able to edit again this time. Extremely sexy (talk) 20:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
But, please, try to appeal the block. 07:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by IntfictExpert (talkcontribs)
Apparently, I can only edit this page (i.e. my own user talkpage), but my appeal will never be granted. Extremely sexy (talk) 19:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Yes, it will, if you use a good enough reason. Interactive Fiction Expert/Talk to me 09:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Being what exactly: none at all? Extremely sexy (talk) 18:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Stop being modest. Interactive Fiction Expert/Talk to me 04:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Okay, but the person who changed my blocked period from three months into three weeks forgot to reinstate the original starting time, so it's close to 22 days now instead of "just" 21, and he won't answer my mail concerning this at all. Extremely sexy (talk) 23:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps the blocking admin should reinstate/extend the 3 month block because you blatantly edited another users comments on your last edit. Postoak (talk) 23:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
For your information: this is definitely allowed on your own user talkpage and he corrected my "wil" into "will" himself as well before. Extremely sexy (talk) 16:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry but wrong. It makes no difference whether its on this talk page or someone else's. A common misconception is that you can do whatever you want on your talk page - the talk page is there to allow others to communicate with you. The point is you (and especially you, given past warnings and blocks) do not edit other people's edits. And what other people do is irrelevant. Moondyne 01:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Lots of people delete comments by others on their own talkpages, so that is therefore also forbidden officially? Extremely sexy (talk) 16:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)