User talk:Barryjedmonton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Barryjedmonton, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
  
  

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

— Dismas|^(talk) - 22:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Amber Lynn

The reason I removed the info about Things is because none of it was sourced. Reading it over again I see that a lot of it doesn't really have much to do with Lynn but with the film itself and should therefore go on the article for the film. Also, there are five paragraphs about a single film appearance. It wasn't even some Hollywood blockbuster, it was a B-movie. Then there are the statements like "...has since become one of the biggest cult films in Canadian history..." Who says it's the biggest? Any source for that? By whose standards is it the biggest? Also, "...Amber Lynns legendary mainstream performance in the film..." Who said it was legendary? Are they noted movie critics? Or just some guys who put up a web site?

Those are my problems with the material. Basically, it's unsourced, contains weasel words, and makes much ado about a very small movie. Dismas|^(talk) 21:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)