User talk:Barneyboo

Hello Barneyboo, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log so we can meet you and help you get started. If you need editing help, visit Wikipedia:How to edit a page. For format questions, visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. TimothyPilgrim 20:52, Mar 22, 2004 (UTC)

Hello, Barneyboo. Thanks for your note on the New user log. We could use an expert on home shopping channels; looks like you've found your niche. Have fun! Chris Roy 21:41, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for the typo fix. (You know it's time to stop editing articles and go to bed when...) Aranel 03:20, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Np dude :) I'm just borrrrrred so editing typos is like FUN to me right now :/ BB

That's fine, everything's free on Wikipedia! --Joe D 11:50, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry about overwrite in Shenyang article.

Hey Barneyboo, I accidentally overwrote your edit in the Shenyang article earlier today. (I just noticed while reviewing the history.) Sorry about that. I see your point about being more NPOV, so I will rephrase that section to try to make it better. Cheers --DV 06:52, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Not a problem - it's the nature of Wikipedia after all! Barneyboo 10:02, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

[edit] English disambiguation on User page

Hi. Please disambiguate English on your user page. For example, English. Thanks. RedWolf 20:49, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Hugh O'Connor

I was wondering if you have seen the revised version of Hugh O'Connor? Would you be willing to change your vote? California12 2:02, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

Definitely - I appreciate the changes that have been made. Barneyboo 00:25, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Thanks ! California12 2:38, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Computer and Video games improvment drive

[edit] BD2412's RFA

Although my RfA is not over yet, I figured that since so many people voted before it had been posted, I may as well start thanking people before it wraps up. It'll take me that long to thank everyone who voted anyway! Thank you, Barneyboo, for your support - I'll do my best as an admin to make the reality of Wikipedia rise to the level of the dream. BD2412 T 23:43, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] "Stephen Goodfellow" Vanity? Perhaps. Content? Yes.

Hi Barneyboo,

I'm hoping to convince you that the entry on "Stephen Goodfellow" is not a vanity article and might be reinstated. The article in Wikipedia was brought to my attention a few months ago, since it was a direct reference to me, I enlarged on it. As to Jamie's curt (if not a little humorous) reference, my notability may be almost insignificant to the larger world, but can make claim to the creation of the Micropointillist medium and can drag a plethora of poor unsuspecting witnesses to attest to that fact. The few other minor achievements may be of even smaller stature, but perhaps worthy of note to some web archeologist in the far future. A google search of my name ought to dredge up some stuff. I can be reached at esteban@goodfelloweb.com - please put 'wikipedia' in the subject - I got a LOT of spam.

Happy new Year!

Sincerely,

Stephen Goodfellow

• Thanks for taking the time to contact me, Stephen. I've done some further research, and I still stand by my original vote. Your appeal to me is rather contradictory. Notability is a major point of contention in Wikipedia, mainly becauase we're all on the look-out for the smallest bit of opinion, or point of view in articles, and deciding whether or not an article is 'notable' is inherently subjective, unless the entire community can agree to a strict criteria (whether that's alexa rankings, google page rank etc. etc.) So, when you say my notability may be almost insignificant to the larger world, that's really just a straight admission that it won't meet many people's criteria for inclusion, based on notability. Likewise, being able to quote a handful of people that you were the brain behind Micropointillism is fine, but not as an argument for inclusion in Wikipedia, where wider awareness is expected. A Google search on your claim to fame shows less than 200 hits, and a number of them are pages on your own site. Barneyboo (Talk) 12:36, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Page Blanking

Don't blank out pages that you don't like. Kalmia 08:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

I think it was more than necessary when you choose to vandalise user pages, which previously did not exist. Barneyboo (Talk) 13:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] hey sexy

hey, i thought your pic was hot, i want to chat with you sometime... i'll be online later i cant wait

[edit] 'ello 'ello from Canada

feel like a chat sometime? if so reply back! Vihrea 04:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting Vandalism

Thanks for reverting the random vandalism on my talk page, appreciate it. B.Mearns^*, KSC 23:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Messed up the page

Well hello there.

My profile is shit. :[

I give up, this thing's too hard. scatman839

[edit] hello Barneyboo theBlackbay here 1984 is upon us! :)

Help From fellow Wikipedians against censorship!

Thank you for your time I was wondering if i could ask your opinion?? :)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin here is the Article on G. Edward Griffin that I have just reconstructed and am still in the process of doing, But it's been put up for deletion?.

I was wondering if you could pitch in a comment in any direction you feel but I believe this man is very notable having Authored such books as The Creature from Jekyll Island a history of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, but also many many more films as well, also being a member of many organisations.

Me being an inclusionist of sorts I would rather see changes made rather than a wholesale deletion, what do you think?

The man is very notable he has been doing this sort of work since the 60’s when he created the “The Capitalist Conspiracy” one of the first and most documented histories of Political Corruption in film that I know of.

Thank you for all your help, I’m just starting out in Wikipedia I have created the Benjamin H. Freedman, article and reconstructed the The Money Masters article and some others but I need help here! Any help of mine you may need or want in any regard in the future just ask :)

Also any contribution you would like to make to improve the article please consider!

Really i wouldn't ask if i did not really think this article worthy.

-Theblackbay 10:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Threepointsymbol digitalindustry.jpg .theblackBay. sample site

[edit] Hi :)

Hey hi add me to your msn, mine is bradd36@hotmail.com :)

[edit] hello

hi. nice page you got there. btw i imported the pessimist tag from your page. it applies to me also. thanx. Keops1988 14:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] World's Smallest Political Quiz userbox

You may be interested in User:Audacity/Userboxes/WSPQ, which is a replacement for the old Political Chart userbox. The new userbox takes the two variables (economic and personal freedom), calculates which political alignment they place you into (Statist, Libertarian, Liberal, Centrist, or Conservative), and links your userpage to the appropriate category.

Please reply to User talk:Audacity, as I will not be watching your talk page. Λυδαcιτγ 07:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F. Thank you. Delivered on behalf of user:xaosflux 01:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:E4spoof.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:E4spoof.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ch4original.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ch4original.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)