User talk:Barneca

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

Feb 2007 - June 2007 July 2007 - Aug 2007 Sept 2007 - Oct 2007 Nov 2007 - Dec 2007 Jan 2008 - Feb 2008 Mar 2008 - Apr 2008 May 2008 - June 2008

[edit] Galápagos Islands task force

Hi Barneca. In view of your significant contributions to the article Galápagos Islands, I thought that you might be interested in visiting the new task force, Galápagos Islands task force. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 21:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] my RfA - Ta!

Gwen gleans, wending keen by the wikirindle.

Thanks for supporting my RfA, which went through 93/12/5. I'll be steadfast in this trust the en.Wikipedia community has given me. Cheers! Gwen Gale (talk) 01:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hey!!

Do you happen to be online at the moment? Dusti^{complain/compliment} 16:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Thread continued on Dusti's talk page: User talk:Dustihowe#yes. --barneca (talk) 16:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] {{-curled brackets-}} in header

Noted; thanks for fixing that up. The links work for me fine in this browser, but the automatic edit summaries have stalled when {{user}} and similar templates are used in-header in the past, so I understand where you're coming from. Thanks again. ;) Anthøny 08:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

No problem, glad you understood what I was trying to say! I try to make that change whenever I notice it, but I never know how to clearly word the explanation for what I'm doing. --barneca (talk) 11:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Barbaro family

I wanted to give you a heads up on the possible return of sock puppet/puppeteer User:Mctrain, it looks like User:Chiboyers is readding material to the Barbaro family page that was added by this group of puppets. I am tempted to revert and block, but I wanted to get your input first. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 02:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi Daniel,

I had blissfully forgotten about him during my break. Yes, that is definitely him, and you can feel quite comfortable in blocking and reverting as a blatantly obvious sock, with no worry of a risk of mistaken identity. --barneca (talk) 02:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

done, it retrospect it was a pretty easy choice, but since I am new at this I needed a little reassurance, thanks. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 02:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Glad to help, better safe than sorry. --barneca (talk) 02:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

The user is contesting the block. A little more evidence would be nice at this point. -- Ned Scott 07:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Scratch that, it was more obvious than I thought. -- Ned Scott 07:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Heh

Wow, imagine if RfAs were like the demonstration discussion you wrote here, especially the last three lines of it! :) Acalamari 17:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

It was still quite funny though. :) Acalamari 03:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I try. :) --barneca (talk) 03:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ANI, June 2008

Thank you for jumping on top of that issue as soon as you did, I really appreciate it. I was reading through the note you left on his page, I was thinking, we should consider the last warning that he recieved his last, so there is always a deterrent if he feels he wishes to contend. Best regards, Chafford (talk) 18:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Back?

Are you back? Per your request when you went on wikibreak, I added your talk page to my watchlist.  :-) --Kralizec! (talk) 02:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm back. I'm trying to reduce my time here even though I'm back, but as usual that isn't working out great. At the very least I'll be back enough to check my own talk page. Thanks for keeping an eye out. BTW, I guess you noticed (a thread or two up the page) our friend is back. --barneca (talk) 02:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] image speedy

thanks for this. I was about to do an IAR delete because I couldn't find the right speedy) when you beat me to it _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 04:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Sure thing. I wasn't sure what the right speedy criterion was either, but figured no one whose opinion mattered to me would complain. --barneca (talk) 10:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] while you're here

Could you deal with this?. :) Gwen Gale (talk) 14:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Done. doesn't seem to be a troll (unlike some people), so only blocked for 31 hours. We'll see what happens after that. --barneca (talk) 14:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I think that's ok. User's only (very) upset about a couple of A7 deletions. I didn't take it as a threat. Gwen Gale (talk) 14:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Incorrect Warning

I have been editing the the "Bareback (sex)" article and i have been editing to return it to its original quality. After the vandalism it endured. I then receive a warning telling me i will be block if i do not stop. If you wish to post me a warning please read the changes before giving the warning as it is aimed at the wrong person in this case.

Thank Matthew Barram

I've replied on your talk page: User talk:123.243.186.175. --barneca (talk) 01:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] But can you unblock Eremia , I need only one account , I will use only this !

Please , Barneca , can you unblock Eremia !

I need only one account !

I am waiting for a message !

I will not use abusively an onther account ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.203.173.69 (talk) 10:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] IP Editor returning to his old ways.

Don't know if you remember this in too much detail, but a while back there was an IP editor who posted a few personal attacks and recieved a warning. Part of the conversation can be found here to help reference: here. This user posted under multiple IPs. One of those IPs is now back in the same articles and returning to personally attacking fellow editors here. I was going to post to WP:ANI but since this is a repeat offense and you dealt with it before I felt it may be helpful to drop a note to you first. Thanks! -- TRTX ^{T / C} 21:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)