User talk:Barcex

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please contact me at es:Usuario Discusión:Barcex

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

Vaya, como ya os habéis cansado de disponer de la wikipedia en castellano a vuestra santa voluntad sin respetar a nadie con eso de que sois bibliotecarios, ahora pasáis a ésta. Como ya he dicho varias veces, me parece estupendo que se redirija el artículo, pero siempre que se llegue a un consenso a través de una votación. Si tanto interés tienes en borrarlo, pues lo votas y ya, eso cuesta menos que estar borrando y redirigiendo el artículo todo el rato. Gaudio 08:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

There was just your consensus, you didn't care for anyone else's opinions, something you guys are very used to do in Spanish wikipedia. You guys cannot use your caciquism here, just in Spanish wikipedia, the worst wikpedia EVER thanks to people like you. Gaudio 08:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

I beg your pardon, I started with good manners. It's always you guys who want to insult or to be rude. I'm not going to retract, what you guys have done was vandalism, I have already explained you the reasons. In stead of respecting people's opinions, now you feel upset, well, you guys make lots of people feel upset with your behaviour, maybe you should retract Gaudio 09:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Wow, so after more than one year repeating everywhere in the wikipedias that you should have common rules, now you realised we should.Gaudio 09:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] speedy deletion

Hi Barcex. Thanks for your message and your question about speedy deletion. The rules about what can be speedy deleted and what cannot be are at WP:SPEEDY. In my judgment the page that you proposed did not meet those guideliens. If you disagree with me, you can take the page in question to articles for deletion. Best wishes, Bucketsofg 13:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again for your note. Yes, I understood that to be your point. It is, however, not the way this is done. If the article in question survives the deletion discussion, there should be a record of that discussion. Deletion would destroy that record. Bucketsofg 15:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Are you kidding me? I don't have to retract, and you guys have called me much worse things in Spanish wikipedia, and no one has apologised, I'm not going to retract, and as you can see, I'm not the only one who considered inappropriate your behaviour. I'm afraid YOU have to retract and not only of this thing about Érika Ortiz Rocasolano, but also of all the things you guys do in Spanish wikipedia as excellent administrators. Gaudio 19:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

No, you retract, and as a administrator of Spanish wikipedia is your responsibility to have allowed all the things you guys (vosotros, vosotras, ustedes) have done me there. Don't play the victim, please, and do retract about that, and about what you are doing here now. Gaudio 20:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)